BVA9502570 DOCKET NO. 93-08 728 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in San Diego, California THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an increased rating for residuals of a left below the knee amputation, evaluated 40 percent disabling, for purposes of accrued benefits. 2. Entitlement to an increased rating for scars of the right calf with retained foreign bodies, evaluated 10 percent disabling, for purposes of accrued benefits. 3. Entitlement to an increased rating for multiple scars of the left buttock and thigh, evaluated 10 percent disabling, for purposes of accrued benefits. 4. Entitlement to a total disability rating on the basis of individual unemployability, for purposes of accrued benefits. 5. Entitlement to service connection for the cause of the veteran’s death. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESSES AT HEARING ON APPEAL The veteran and the appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD William Harryman, Counsel REMAND The veteran had active service from November 1942 to March 1944; he died in March 1992. This case came before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) on appeal from rating decisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in San Diego, California. The record reflects that, at the time of his death in March 1992, an appeal was pending concerning the veteran’s claims for increased ratings for his service-connected disabilities and for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability. Following the veteran’s death, the appellant, his surviving spouse, filed a claim for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation and for accrued benefits. The Certificate of Death indicates that the veteran died at a VA medical center of a respiratory disorder and that an autopsy was performed. However, no medical records regarding his final hospitalization are on file; neither does the claims file contain a copy of the autopsy report. The Board believes that those records might be helpful in determining the level of impairment present as to each of the veteran’s service-connected disabilities prior to his death. Those records should be obtained since they were constructively of record at the time of the veteran’s death. Accordingly, this case is REMANDED for the following actions: 1. The RO should request that the appellant furnish the names and addresses of all health care providers who treated or examined the veteran for any of his service-connected disabilities since his separation from service, including the approximate dates of such treatment or examination. After obtaining any necessary releases, the RO should then request copies of any of the veteran’s medical records from all sources indicated by the appellant which are not already of record. Particularly, the RO should request copies of the records of the veteran’s final hospitalization, including a copy of the autopsy protocol. All records received should be associated with the veteran’s claims file. 2. Following completion of the requested development, the RO should again consider the appellant’s claim regarding increased ratings for the veteran’s service-connected disabilities for accrued benefits purposes. If action taken remains adverse to her, she and her accredited representative should be furnished a supplemental statement of the case concerning that issue; a reasonable period of time should be given for them to respond. Regardless of action taken regarding that issue, the case should then be returned to the Board to permit appellate consideration of the other appealed issues. By this REMAND, the Board intimates no opinion, either legal or factual, as to any final determination warranted in this case. No action is required of the appellant until she is notified by the RO. Appellate consideration of the issue relating to service connection for the cause of the veteran’s death is deferred pending completion of the requested development and adjudication. N. R. ROBIN Member, Board of Veterans’ Appeals The Board of Veterans’ Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).