BVA9500152 DOCKET NO. 93-10 908 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Nashville, Tennessee THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased evaluation for the residuals of fifth and seventh thoracic vertebrae fractures, currently rated 10 percent disabling. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Hilary L. Goodman, Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active service from July 1975 to July 1980. This appeal arises from a January 1992 rating decision which continued a 10 percent disability evaluation for the residuals of fifth and seventh thoracic vertebrae fractures. In a January 1993 rating decision, service connection for bilateral hearing loss was denied. A November 1993 letter from the veteran may be construed as a notice of disagreement with that decision. This issue is referred to the originating agency for appropriate action. REMAND The veteran contends that her back disability has worsened with constant, severe back pain and decreased range of motion. She has indicated that she has gone to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Memphis, for her back pain but has not been examined since July 1989. It is herein noted that the most recent VA outpatient treatment record is dated in November 1992. The Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board), having reviewed the record, finds that further development is required. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED to the originating agency for the following action: 1. The originating agency should request, from the VA Medical Center, Memphis, legible copies of the veteran's outpatient treatment records dated subsequent to November 1992 as well as any inpatient treatment records. All records obtained should be associated with the veteran's claims file. 2. After the medical records have been obtained, the veteran should be scheduled for an orthopedic examination. The express purpose of the examination is to evaluate the current severity of the residuals of the vertebral fractures. All necessary tests and studies, including X-ray examination, should be conducted and clinical manifestations should be reported in detail. The examiner should be given access to the veteran's claims file for a sufficient period of time prior to the examination to allow for a complete review of the record. 3. Upon completion of the above, the originating agency should review this case. If any determination made is unfavorable to the veteran, a supplemental statement of the case which sets forth the evidence received since the October 1992 supplemental statement of the case should be issued to the veteran and her representative. The veteran and her representative should be given the appropriate period of time in which to respond. Thereafter, the case should be returned to the Board for further appellate consideration, if otherwise in order. The purpose of this REMAND is to obtain clarifying medical information and ensure all due process. No action is required of the veteran until she receives further notice. ALBERT D. TUTERA Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This action has been taken in accordance with the Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-446, § 303, 108 Stat. 4645, ___ (1994), and is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).