BVA9508172 DOCKET NO. 93-10 115 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in St. Petersburg, Florida THE ISSUE Entitlement to an apportionment of the veteran's Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) compensation benefits on behalf of his spouse and minor children. ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Raymond F. Ferner, Counsel INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA or Board) on appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in St. Petersburg, Florida. The veteran had active service from August 1980 to April 1989. A special apportionment decision dated in May 1992 granted an apportionment of the veteran's VA compensation benefits in the amount of $74 a month on behalf of his spouse and minor children. The veteran expressed disagreement with that decision. This is a contested claim and the appellee is the veteran's spouse. REMAND The veteran has represented that his minor children are not in the appellee's custody, but rather are in the custody of his parents by virtue of a court order dated June 26, 1991. The appellee has represented and confirmed that she and the veteran's three children are living with his parents. The Board believes that a copy of this court order should be obtained from the veteran, the appellee or his parents, or if necessary, from the appropriate court having jurisdiction over custody matters. Also, in a letter dated in March 1993, the veteran reported that a divorce from the appellee was to be final in the next month. While the RO did request that the veteran provide a copy of the divorce decree, a further request to the veteran and the appellee concerning this matter would be appropriate. Lastly, it is not clear that the appellee was provided a copy of, or the substance of, the appeal the veteran filed in this case as required by 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105A (West 1991). Therefore, in order to give the parties every consideration with respect to the present appeal, it is the Board's opinion that further development of the case is desirable. Accordingly, this case is REMANDED for the following actions: 1. If not previously accomplished, the appellee should be furnished a copy of, or the substance of, the veteran's appeal. 2. A copy of any court order pertaining to the custody of the veteran's minor children should be requested from the veteran, the appellee, and the veteran's parents. If necessary, a copy of the court order should be obtained directly from the court having jurisdiction in custody matters. 3. The veteran and the appellee should be requested to furnish information concerning their marital status, including a copy of any final court decree of divorce. When the development requested has been completed, the case should again be reviewed by the RO on the basis of the additional evidence. The parties should then be furnished a supplemental statement of the case and be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond before the record is returned to the Board for further review. The purpose of this REMAND is to obtain additional development, and the Board does not intimate any opinion as to the merits of the case, either favorable or unfavorable, at this time. Either party is free to submit any additional evidence they desire to have considered in connection with the current appeal. No action is required of either party until they are notified. JACQUELINE E. MONROE Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1994).