Citation Nr: 0000053 Decision Date: 01/03/00 Archive Date: 12/28/01 DOCKET NO. 93-12 874 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania THE ISSUE Entitlement to service connection for a low back disability. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD D. Schechter, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran served on active duty from January 12, 1954, to March 23, 1954. The appeal arises from the September 1991 rating decision, in the form of a letter, of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, confirming a prior, final RO denial in May 1989 of service connection for a low back disability. In the course of appeal, the veteran testified before a hearing officer at the RO in November 1992. A copy of the hearing transcript is included within the claims folder Following perfection of an appeal, the Board in June 1995 found that new and material evidence had been submitted pertaining to the claim for service connection for a low back disability, and accordingly reopened the claim and remanded it for appropriate development and a determination by the RO based on the merits of the claim. Following development and RO review of the claim in subsequent rating decisions and Supplemental Statements of the Case, upon return of the case to the Board, the Board in January 1997 again remanded the claim for further development. The claim has now been again returned to the Board. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. There is evidence of the veteran having sustained a pre- service back injury in February 1953. 2. On the pre-enlistment examination in January 1954, there was no evidence of residuals of pre-service back injury; all that was noted was a thoraco-lumbar scoliosis at L1, which is a developmental abnormality. 3. The veteran was discharged from service in March 1954 due to a chronic lumbosacral strain. 4. A chronic lumbosacral strain developed during service. CONCLUSION OF LAW A chronic lumbosacral strain was incurred in wartime service. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5107(a) (West 1991 and Supp 1999). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION Following the reopening of this claim by the Board in June 1995 and a remand at that time for VA examination and adjudication of the claim on the merits, there has been serious non-compliance with the Board's instructions. This resulted in the case again being remanded in January 1997. Since the 1997 remand we have a second VA examination which was non-responsive to the Board's questions, and in which the VA physician did not review the record. Thereafter, the problem was further compounded by the issuance of a Supplemental Statement of the Case in August 1999, which held that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection for a low back disorder. This procedural error, in itself, would require a due process remand (which would be a third remand) as correctly pointed out by the veteran's representative. The Board will not remand this issue a third time, because the evidence developed since 1995 is favorable to the veteran and supports allowance of the appeal. There is no clear and unmistakable evidence of a chronic pre-service acquired back disability, such as to rebut the presumption of soundness at enlistment. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1111, 1137 (West 1991). All that was noted on the pre-enlistment examination was a thoracolumbar scoliosis at L1, which is ordinarily considered a developmental abnormality. Service connection cannot be granted for a developmental abnormality. 38 C.F.R. § 3.303 (c) (1999). There is evidence of a pre-service back injury in February 1953, residuals of which were not noted on the pre-enlistment examination. The Board has thus concluded, consistent with the evidence and the laws and regulations, that the presumption of soundness applies as regards acquired low back pathology, and that any residuals of a February 1953 pre-service low back injury were acute and transitory and subsided without residual disability. As such, the veteran entered service with only a developmental thoracolumbar scoliosis. Evidence added to the claims folder in August 1998, consisting of additional service medical records, shows that he was discharged from service with a chronic lumbosacral strain. The notation that this disorder pre-existed service is not sufficient to rebut the presumption of soundness at enlistment. It is inconsistent with clinical findings on the pre-enlistment examination and, as such, cannot constitute clear and unmistakable evidence of the pre-service existence of acquired low back pathology. Accordingly a proper basis is afforded for granting service connection for a chronic lumbosacral strain. ORDER Service connection for a low back disability is granted. BRUCE E. HYMAN Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals