BVA9507606 DOCKET NO. 93-19 404 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Manila, Philippines THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased (compensable) evaluation for residual scars due to a shrapnel wound of the right leg. ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD J. W. Loeb, Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran served on active duty during World War II. This case came before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Manila, Philippines. REMAND A review of the record reveals that on the veteran’s most recent VA compensation examination for rating purposes, in November 1991, a shell fragment scar was observed on the right leg, however, it was not indicated whether the scarring was tender and painful, ulcerated or resulted in any limitation of function. The veteran contended in July 1993 that his service-connected right leg disability causes pain. VA has a duty to assist the veteran in the development of facts pertinent to his claim under 38 C.F.R. § 3.103(a)(1994). The United States Court of Veterans Appeals has held that fulfillment of the VA's duty to assist the veteran includes providing him with a thorough and contemporaneous medical examination. Littke v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 90, 92 (1990). Accordingly, the Board finds that additional development is warranted prior to final disposition of this case. Therefore, this case is being REMANDED to the RO for the following actions: 1. The veteran should be permitted to submit any additional evidence in his possession that is pertinent to the issue on appeal. He should also be requested to provide the names, addresses, and dates of treatment of any physicians or facilities, including the VA, that have treated him for his service-connected right leg disability since November 1991. Any medical provider identified should be asked for copies of the veteran's clinical records. Any records obtained should be associated with the claims folder. The veteran should be asked to sign any necessary consent forms for release of his private medical records. 2. The veteran should be given a special orthopedic examination, in accordance with the VA Physician's Guide for Disability Evaluation Examinations, to determine the current severity of his service-connected residual shrapnel wound scars of the right leg. The examiner should obtain a recent employment history from the veteran, including notation of any time lost from employment due to his right leg disability. It should be specified whether the residual scarring is tender and painful or ulcerated. All necessary tests and studies, including range of motion studies of the right leg, should be conducted, and all findings should be reported in detail. The examiner should give an opinion as to the functional limitation caused by the shrapnel wounds of the right leg from the standpoint of a person working or seeking work. 3. The RO should then readjudicate the issue on appeal, to include consideration of all applicable diagnostic codes and regulations, including the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b) (West 1991), as well as 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.321(b)(1), 4.7, and 4.40 (1994). When the above actions have been completed, unless the benefit sought is granted to the satisfaction of the veteran, he should be provided with a supplemental statement of the case and given the applicable time period to respond. The case should then be returned to the Board, if otherwise in order. The veteran need take no action until notified. THOMAS J. DANNAHER Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This action has been taken in accordance with the Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-446, § 303, 108 Stat. 4645, ___ (1994), and is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1994).