Citation Nr: 0000218 Decision Date: 01/05/00 Archive Date: 12/28/01 DOCKET NO. 96-27 558A ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Seattle, Washington THE ISSUE Entitlement to waiver of recovery of a loan guaranty indebtedness in the amount of $20,000 plus accrued interest. WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD John R. Pagano, Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active service military service from December 1961 to April 1966. This matter arises from various decisions rendered since September 1995 by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Committee on Waivers and Compromises (COWC) at the Seattle, Washington, Regional Office (RO). In the aggregate, these decisions granted the veteran waiver of recovery of a loan guaranty indebtedness in the amount of $7,222.92 while denying waiver of recovery of the remainder of the indebtedness which totaled $20,000, plus accrued interest. Following compliance with the procedural requirements set forth in 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 1991), the case was forwarded to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) for appellate consideration. REMAND Preliminary review indicates that this case is not yet ready for appellate disposition for the reasons that follow. In granting the veteran partial waiver of recovery of the existing indebtedness of $27,222.92 in October 1995, the COWC determined that the veteran was not guilty of fraud, misrepresentation, or bad faith in the creation of the debt, but that a waiver of recovery of the loan guaranty indebtedness in the amount of $20,000 plus accrued interest was not warranted as the collection of the debt was not against the principles of equity and good conscience. The COWC determined that collection of the latter amount would not subject the veteran to undue economic hardship. During the pendency of this appeal, the appellant requested a personal hearing before a traveling Member of the Board. Such a hearing was conducted on February 25, 1999, before the undersigned. During the proceeding, it was noted that the latest statement of the veteran's monthly income and expenses was furnished by him in August 1995. Thus, more than four years has passed since that information was submitted. The Board believes, and during his personal hearing the veteran agreed, that this information is now stale and that more current information should be furnished by the veteran prior to final appellate consideration. In view of the foregoing, this case is REMANDED to the RO for the following: The RO should furnish the veteran a VA Form 20-5655, Financial Status Report. The veteran should be requested to complete this form in full. He should be advised that his failure to do so may adversely affect his claim. Once the foregoing has been received, the COWC should again review the claim. If the benefit sought on appeal is not granted, the veteran should be furnished a supplemental statement of the case. He should also be given the appropriate time period in which to respond. Thereafter, subject to current appellate procedures, the case should be returned to the Board for further consideration. The veteran need take no action until so informed. The purpose of this REMAND is both to obtain clarifying information and to accord the appellant due process of law. No inference should be drawn regarding the final disposition of the claim. The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter or matters the Board has remanded to the RO. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). R. F. WILLIAMS Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1999).