BVA9503315 DOCKET NO. 93-07 246 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in North Little Rock, Arkansas THE ISSUES Entitlement to service connection for scoliosis of the lumbar and thoracic segments of the spine, based upon aggravation of a congenital condition. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: The American Legion WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Heather J. Harner, Associate Counsel REMAND The veteran had active duty from February 1991 to June 1991. The veteran contends that his preexisting scoliosis was aggravated by his military service. On an examination prior to entrance into service in February 1991, radiographic studies reportedly showed long thoracolumbar curve convexity to the right, which measured 15 degrees. In June 1991, the veteran was seen with increased pain upon physical activity for the past 2 to 4 months. It was noted that he had an 8-year history of scoliosis. X-rays reportedly revealed a 25- degree levoscoliosis of the upper thoracic spine and a 30-degree dextroscoliosis. Radiographic studies by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in August 1991 reflected scoliosis of the thoracic spine with convexity to the right and lumbar spine with convexity to the left of mild to moderate extent. On examination for the Texas Rehabilitation Commission in December 1991, it was reported that he had a 35-degree dorsal lumbar scoliosis to the left. It was recommended that he be considered for rehabilitation and that he have additional radiographic studies in one year. To ensure that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has met its duty to assist the claimant in developing the facts pertinent to the claim and to ensure full compliance with due process requirements, the case is REMANDED to the regional office (RO) for the following development: 1. The RO should obtain the X-ray films taken in conjunction with the orthopedic examinations performed in February 1991 (prior to the veteran's entrance into service), in June 1991 (when the veteran was discharged from service), and in August 1991 (pursuant to a VA orthopedic examination). 2. The veteran should also be requested to provide the names and approximate dates of any further radiographic studies of his spine since December 1991. In addition, he should be requested to provide the names of any health care providers who have treated him for his scoliosis either prior to service or since his discharge from service. Those records should be obtained and associated with the claims folder. 3. Thereafter, the RO should arrange for an orthopedic examination of the veteran to determine the current status of his spinal disability. The examination should include radiographic studies of the thoracic and lumbar segments of the spine unless there are recent (1994) studies obtained pursuant to the above-requested development. 4. After the requested development has been completed, a medical opinion should be obtained by the RO from a board-certified radiologist describing the X-ray films of the veteran's spine taken before, during, and after the veteran's period of service. The veteran's claims file should be made available, along with the X-ray films. The radiologist should specifically discuss and compare the pre-service finding that the veteran's spine was mildly curved at a 15- degree angle with the findings of 25- and 30-degree curvature in June 1991. The radiologist should review the subsequent X- ray films for comparison as well to determine whether there has been a permanent increase in the curvature. 5. After the development requested above has been completed, the RO should again review the record. If any benefit sought on appeal, for which a notice of disagreement has been filed, remains denied, the appellant and his representative should be furnished a supplemental statement of the case and given the opportunity to respond. Thereafter, the case should be returned to the Board, if in order. The purpose of this remand is to assist the veteran in the development of his claim. The Board intimates no opinion as to the ultimate outcome of this case. The appellant need take no action unless otherwise notified. V. L. JORDAN Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).