BVA9508124 DOCKET NO. 93-14 152 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Providence, Rhode Island THE ISSUES 1. Whether new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen a claim of entitlement to service connection for a back disorder, secondary to service-connected bilateral pes planus. 2. Entitlement to an increased evaluation for bilateral pes planus, currently rated as 30 percent disabling. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD John D. Nachmann, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active service from August 1951 to August 1955. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a rating decision of October 1992 by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Providence, Rhode Island, Regional Office (RO). In a March 1993 statement, the veteran raised the issues of entitlement to a total rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities and entitlement to service connection for depression, secondary to service-connected disabilities. These issues have not been developed or certified for appellate consideration and are therefore referred to the RO for appropriate action. REMAND By decision in April 1988, the Board denied the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a chronic back disorder. At that time, the Board noted that although the evidence of record indicated that the veteran's service-connected bilateral pes planus may have exacerbated the veteran's underlying back disorder, the evidence of record did not demonstrate that the veteran's chronic back disorder had been caused by his service- connected bilateral pes planus. In Allen v. Brown, No. 93-245 (U.S. Vet. App. Mar. 17, 1995), the United States Court of Veterans Appeals (Court) concluded that under the laws and regulations applicable to the VA, when aggravation of a veteran's non-service-connected condition is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected condition, the veteran shall be compensated for the degree of disability (but only that degree) over and above the degree of disability existing prior to the aggravation. Since this decision was only recently promulgated, a determination as to the degree, if any, that the veteran's non-service-connected back disorder has been aggravated by his service-connected bilateral pes planus has not been made. The Board finds that such a determination should be made as the report of a July 1992 VA examination discloses that the veteran had developed degenerative joint disease of the lumbar and thoracic spine that was accelerated by the veteran's gait problems which were produced by his pes planus. Therefore, in order to give the veteran every consideration with respect to the present appeal, it is the Board's opinion that further development of the case is warranted. See Ivey v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 320, 322-3 (1992). Accordingly, this case is REMANDED for the following actions: 1. The veteran should be afforded a special orthopedic examination in order to determine the nature and severity of his bilateral pes planus. The claims file or copies of all relevant records contained therein must be made available to the examiner prior to and during the examination for a complete study of the case. 2. The veteran should be afforded a special orthopedic examination in order to assess the nature and severity of his back disorder. The examiner should be asked to render an opinion as to the degree of aggravation of the veteran's back disorder as a result of his service-connected bilateral pes planus over the degree of disability existing prior to the aggravation. The claims file or copies of all relevant records contained therein must be made available to the examiner prior to and during the examination for a complete study of the case. 3. After the above development has been completed, the RO should again review and adjudicate the issue of whether new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen a claim of entitlement to service connection for a back disorder, secondary to service-connected bilateral pes planus pursuant to Allen v. Brown, a copy of which is enclosed in the claims file. In addition, after completion of the requested development, the RO should review the veteran's claim of entitlement to an increased evaluation for bilateral pes planus. If any determination remains adverse to the veteran, the case should be returned to the Board after compliance with the provisions for processing appeals, including the issuance of a supplemental statement of the case and provision of the applicable time period for response thereto. The purpose of this REMAND is to obtain additional development, and the Board does not intimate any opinion as to the merits of the case, either favorable or unfavorable, at this time. No action is required of the veteran until he is notified. WARREN W. RICE, JR. Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1994).