Citation Nr: 0003166 Decision Date: 02/08/00 Archive Date: 02/15/00 DOCKET NO. 98-08 543A ) DATE ) ) THE ISSUE Whether there was clear and unmistakable error in the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) decision of July 1997 denying entitlement to service connection for post-traumatic encephalopathy and entitlement to a compensable disability rating for residual scars of a shell fragment wound to the head and neck. REPRESENTATION Moving Party Represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Heather J. Harter, Counsel FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The veteran in this case had recognized guerrilla service from April to November 1945. 2. On June 8, 1999, a motion for revision of a July 1997 Board decision based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE) was filed. 3. In April 1999, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (hereinafter, "the Court") vacated and remanded the July 1997 Board decision. CONCLUSION OF LAW In the absence of a final decision, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of the veteran's motion for revision of a decision based on clear and unmistakable error. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7111 (West Supp. 1999); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1400 (1999). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION All final Board decisions are subject to revision on the basis of CUE except for those decisions which have been appealed to and decided by the Court, and decisions on issues which have subsequently been decided by the Court. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1400 (1999). The Court has vacated and remanded the Board decision that has been challenged on the basis of clear and unmistakable error in the moving party's motion. Thus, there is no final decision for the Board to review on the basis of clear and unmistakable error. Under such circumstances, the Board does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of the motion and it is dismissed without prejudice. ORDER The motion is dismissed. S. F. Sylvester Acting Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)