BVA9507953 DOCKET NO. 93-11 739 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Fort Harrison, Montana THE ISSUE Entitlement to service connection for right tarsal tunnel syndrome. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Frank L. Christian, Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran served on active duty from August 1960 to September 1963. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a rating decision of August 1992 from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Fort Harrison, Montana. The Board notes that the veteran initially filed a notice of disagreement with a rating decision confirming a noncompensable evaluation for a right fallen arch, but later clarified that his appeal is limited to the issue of entitlement to service connection for right tarsal tunnel syndrome. Accordingly, the Board will limit its consideration to the service connection issue. CONTENTIONS OF APPELLANT ON APPEAL The veteran contends that his right tarsal tunnel syndrome is a consequence of nerve damage of the right lower extremity sustained during active service in 1962. It is contended that medical opinion and authority submitted by the veteran supports his argument as to the cause of his current right tarsal tunnel syndrome. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991), has reviewed and considered all of the evidence and material of record contained in the veteran's claims file. Based on its review of the relevant evidence in this matter, and for the following reasons and bases, it is the decision of the Board that the evidence of record supports a grant of service connection for right tarsal tunnel syndrome. FINDING OF FACT Right tarsal tunnel syndrome originated during service. CONCLUSION OF LAW Right tarsal tunnel syndrome was incurred during peacetime service. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1131. REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION The Board finds initially that the veteran's claim is plausible and thus well grounded within the meaning of 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West 1991), and that the RO has met its duty to assist him in developing evidence to support his claim. Historically, the veteran's service medical records show that he was seen in April and May 1962 for complaints that his right leg had been bothering him since he tripped approximately one month earlier. Examination disclosed that the veteran's pain was localized to the muscles of the anterior compartment of the lower right leg, with no evidence of bony injury. Appearance and function of the right leg were normal, and X-ray examination was negative. The clinical impression was muscle strain. An entry dated in December 1962 shows that the veteran was seen with complaints of pain in the right ankle or right arch. Examination disclosed tenderness in the right arch, and that arch was found to be not as high as the left arch. The clinical assessment was early fallen arch, right. The veteran was not found to have right tarsal tunnel syndrome during service. He has been granted service connection for the fallen right arch noted during service. VA medical records show that the veteran was found to have right tarsal tunnel syndrome in 1991, which was thought to be secondary to excessive pronation. More recently, in 1992, a VA physician noted that the veteran did not have a fallen right arch. The VA physician expressed his opinion that the veteran's inservice disorder was misdiagnosed as an early fallen arch, right foot, and that his disability actually consists of chronic tarsal tunnel syndrome secondary to inservice trauma to the right foot or leg. The Board finds that opinion persuasive, and concludes that the veteran's currently manifested right tarsal tunnel syndrome may not be dissociated from his clearly documented inservice injury to the right foot. Accordingly, service connection for right tarsal tunnel syndrome is warranted. ORDER Service connection for right tarsal tunnel syndrome is granted. SHANE A. DURKIN Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7266 (West 1991), a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals granting less than the complete benefit, or benefits, sought on appeal is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals within 120 days from the date of mailing of notice of the decision, provided that a Notice of Disagreement concerning an issue which was before the Board was filed with the agency of original jurisdiction on or after November 18, 1988. Veterans' Judicial Review Act, Pub. L. No. 100-687, § 402 (1988). The date which appears on the face of this decision constitutes the date of mailing and the copy of this decision which you have received is your notice of the action taken on your appeal by the Board of Veterans' Appeals.