BVA9501507 DOCKET NO. 93-10 204 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Montgomery, Alabama THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 20 percent for arthritis of the cervical spine, residuals of fracture of C2 and C4. 2. Entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for chronic lumbosacral strain. 3. Entitlement to a compensable evaluation for a sprain of the right ankle. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Jeffrey J. Schueler, Associate Counsel REMAND The veteran had active duty from November 1942 to December 1945, from August 1946 to February 1947, from December 1951 to September 1955, and from November 1960 to November 1961. In a December 1992 rating decision, the regional office increased the veteran's disability rating to 20 percent for the cervical spine disorder and to 10 percent for lumbosacral strain. The veteran has requested that his appeal continue. The veteran's right ankle disability is assigned Diagnostic Code 5271 for limited motion of the ankle. The evidence of record regarding the veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of the right ankle disability consists of a September 1992 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) examination x-ray report and a notation in a private medical report dated in July 1992. Neither document discusses the range of motion of the veteran's right ankle, and the disability cannot properly be evaluated without that information. The case will, therefore, require an additional VA orthopedic examination of the veteran's right ankle disability. To ensure that VA has met its duty to assist the appellant in developing the facts pertinent to the claim, the case is REMANDED to the regional office (RO) for the following development: 1. The RO should obtain and associate with the claims folder all treatment records pertaining to the veteran's cervical spine, lumbosacral strain, and right ankle disabilities, from the Birmingham, and the Montgomery, Alabama, VA Medical Centers since 1987. 2. The veteran should be afforded a VA orthopedic examination to determine the nature and severity of the veteran's cervical spine, lumbosacral strain, and right ankle disabilities. The ranges of motion for each disability should be reported in degrees of arc. The examiner should be requested to state whether, with respect to the cervical spine, a demonstrable deformity of a vertebral body is present. The claims folder should be made available to the examiner for review before the examination. 3. In addition, the examiner should be requested to express an opinion whether any limitation of motion of the lumbar and cervical spine is slight, moderate or severe. The examiner should also be asked to state, if possible, the extent that cervical and lumbar impairment is due to the effect of non-service-connected disorders. If the examiner determines that there is limited motion of the right ankle, then an opinion should be expressed whether such limited motion is moderate or marked. The examination should be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in the VA Physician's Guide for Disability Evaluation Examinations (1985). 4. After the development requested above has been completed to the extent possible, the RO should again review the record. If any benefit sought on appeal, for which a notice of disagreement has been filed, remains denied, the appellant and representative should be furnished a Supplemental Statement of the Case and given the opportunity to respond thereto. Thereafter, the case should be returned to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board), if in order. The Board intimates no opinion as to the ultimate outcome of this case. JOHN E. ORMOND Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).