BVA9503978 DOCKET NO. 93-03 585 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Montgomery, Alabama THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased rating for left knee disability, currently evaluated as 10 percent disabling. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD P. J. McCarty, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active service from August 1988 to December 1989. This appeal arises from a February 1991 decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Montgomery, Alabama, which denied a rating in excess of 10 percent for left knee disability. The Board also notes that the veteran was denied secondary service connection for right knee disability in a rating decision of November 1992. On VA examination in June 1993, he was found to have right knee arthralgia secondary to his service-connected left knee disability. The RO has not rendered a determination as to whether the secondary service connection claim should be reopened based upon the June 1993 examination report. The matter is referred to the RO for appropriate action. CONTENTIONS OF APPELLANT ON APPEAL The veteran contends that he experiences considerable disability as a result of his left knee patellofemoral chondrosis, and that a rating in excess of 10 percent is warranted. Specifically, he maintains that the manifestations of the disability include pain, stiffness, atrophy of the left thigh, and limitation of motion, and that the disability causes him to walk with a limp and necessitates the use of a cane. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991), has reviewed and considered all of the evidence and material of record in the veteran's claims file. Based on its review of the relevant evidence in this matter, and for the following reasons and bases, it is the decision of the Board that the preponderance of the evidence supports a 20 percent disability evaluation for left knee disability. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. All relevant evidence necessary for an equitable disposition of the appeal has been obtained. 2. The veteran's left knee disability is productive of moderate impairment. 3. No unusual or exceptional disability factors have been presented. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for a 20 percent evaluation for the veteran's left knee disability have been met. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1155, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1), and Part 4, including § 4.71a, Code 5257 (1993). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION The Board has found the veteran's claim to be well-grounded within the meaning of 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a). The Board is satisfied that all relevant facts have been properly developed, and that no further assistance is required to comply with the duty to assist the veteran mandated by 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a). In accordance with 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.1, 4.2 (1993) and Schafrath v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 589 (1991), the Board has reviewed the service medical records and all other evidence of record pertaining to the history of the veteran's service-connected left knee disability. The Board has found nothing in the historical record that would lead to a conclusion that the current evidence of record is not adequate for rating purposes. Moreover, the Board is of the opinion that this case presents no evidentiary considerations that would warrant an exposition of the remote clinical histories and findings pertaining to the disability at issue. Disability evaluations are determined by application of VA's Schedule for Rating Disabilities (Rating Schedule), found in 38 C.F.R. Part 4. The percentage ratings contained in the Rating Schedule represent, as far as can be practically determined, the average impairment in earning capacity resulting from diseases or injuries incurred in or aggravated during military service and their residual conditions in civil occupations. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155; 38 C.F.R. Part 4. In January 1990, the RO granted service connection for left patellofemoral chondrosis and assigned a 10 percent evaluation, effective from December 1989. A Medical Evaluation Board determined in October 1989 that the veteran had tenderness on the medial and lateral facets of the left patella, and full range of motion of the left knee with minimal crepitance. X-rays of the left knee were normal. A February 1991 VA examination report shows that the veteran complained of pain in his left knee after long periods of standing or walking, and with weather changes. He also reported walking "awkwardly" to take the pressure off of his left knee, and taking Motrin to relieve his pain. He denied experiencing swelling of the knee. On physical examination he was found to have parapatellar tenderness. Patellar compression produced pain. He had full range of motion. The pertinent diagnoses were status post injury of the left knee with surgery and chondromalacia of the left patella. A June 1992 VA examination report reveals that the veteran complained of pain and swelling of the left knee, difficulty standing and an inability to walk for prolonged periods. Examination showed that he had tenderness in the infrapatellar region, 1+ effusion, and a large scar. He was able to flex the knee 30 degrees, and extend it 45 degrees. He was diagnosed as having traumatic osteoarthritis. A July 1992 MRI of the left knee revealed evidence of a partial tear or hypertrophic synovium of the anterior cruciate ligament tendons. An October 1992 VA examination report shows that the veteran complained of pain in his left knee after walking or standing for long periods of time. His knee felt weak and he reported that he walked with a limp. Examination of the left knee revealed no swelling or effusion. There was slight tenderness over the superior inferior aspect and the superior medical aspect of the patella. Slight tenderness was also noted on patellar compression. Flexion was performed to 90 degrees, and extension to 0 degrees. Questionable mild crepitus was noted. The veteran was unable to perform deep knee bends normally with his left knee, and he could not walk on his heel or toe. He was noted to ambulate with a limp favoring the left knee. X-rays of the knee were normal. He was diagnosed as having residuals of a severe soft tissue injury to the left knee with marked scarring and limited range of motion as described. A June 1993 VA examination report reveals that the veteran complained of having left knee pain almost all of the time, experiencing occasional numbness, and having tenderness over the left knee. He described having sharp pains through the knee and experiencing stiffness. He also reported that he was unable to squat or kneel because of knee pain. Physical examination revealed that the left thigh appeared smaller than the right indicating some atrophy of the quadriceps muscles on the left side. No swelling was noted. He had tenderness around the left patella in almost every direction. Examination of the ligaments of the left knee revealed no evidence of subluxation or laxity. Extension of the left knee was to 0 degrees and flexion of the left knee was to 110 degrees. The veteran requested that knee jerk testing not be performed on his left knee due to pain. He had a negative Lachman's test, though the maneuver was somewhat uncomfortable. The McMurray's sign on the left was very painful, but there was no locking or evidence of meniscal tear. The Apley grind test was very painful on the left. The Apley's stretch test was moderately painful on the left. He had a slight limp and placed most of his weight on his right foot. He was diagnosed as having chondrosis or synovitis of the left knee with some atrophy of the left thigh muscles, gait disturbance, and chronic pain which the examiner found to be genuine. Here, the veteran's left knee disability has been rated under Diagnostic Code (DC) 5257 of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities, 38 C.F.R. Part 4. This code provides a 10 percent rating for slight impairment of the knee, a 20 percent rating for moderate impairment, and a 30 percent rating for severe impairment of the knee. Other pertinent sections of the Schedule for Rating Disabilities include 5260 and 5261. Under DC 5260, flexion limited to 60 degrees warrants a 0 percent rating; flexion limited to 45 degrees warrants a 10 percent rating; a 20 percent rating is provided for flexion limited to 30 degrees; and a 30 percent rating is provided for flexion limited to 15 degrees. Under DC 5261, a 10 percent rating is warranted for extension limited to 10 degrees; a 20 percent rating is assigned for extension limited to 15 degrees; and a 30 percent rating is provided for extension limited to 20 degrees. Although the evidence does not show that the veteran has sufficient limitation of motion to warrant a higher evaluation under DC 5260 or DC 5261, it does show that he also has significant pain, and that the knee disability has resulted in an altered gait and thigh atrophy. Overall, the Board is satisfied that the left knee impairment is moderate, as required for an evaluation of 20 percent. However, in view of the remaining range of left knee motion and the absence of objective evidence of significant instability of the left knee or frequent locking of the left knee, the Board is unable to conclude that the disability is productive of more than the moderate knee impairment contemplated by a 20 percent evaluation. Finally, the Board notes that no unusual or exceptional disability factors warranting extraschedular consideration have been presented. 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1). ORDER A 20 percent evaluation for left knee disability is granted, subject to the criteria applicable to the payment of monetary benefits. SHANE A. DURKIN Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7266 (West 1991), a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals granting less than the complete benefit, or benefits, sought on appeal is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals within 120 days from the date of mailing of notice of the decision, provided that a Notice of Disagreement concerning an issue which was before the Board was filed with the agency of original jurisdiction on or after November 18, 1988. Veterans' Judicial Review Act, Pub. L. No. 100-687, § 402 (1988). The date which appears on the face of this decision constitutes the date of mailing and the copy of this decision which you have received is your notice of the action taken on your appeal by the Board of Veterans' Appeals.