BVA9500631 DOCKET NO. 93-12 482 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Montgomery, Alabama THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased evaluation for traumatic arthritis of the right knee, currently rated 30 percent disabling. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Hilary L. Goodman, Counsel REMAND The veteran had active service from May 1943 to February 1946. This appeal arises from a December 1992 rating decision which continued a 30 percent disability evaluation for traumatic arthritis of the right knee. The most recent Department of Veterans Affairs examination of the veteran was conducted in October 1991. The veteran, in December 1992, requested an increased evaluation for his right knee disability. He has specifically contended that the disability has increased in severity as, even with a leg brace, severe pain and swelling occurs. In support of his claim, a December 1992 report of examination was received from the veteran's physician, Milton A. Wallace, Jr., M.D. The most recent clinical treatment records from Dr. Wallace currently in the claims file are dated in August 1989. The Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board), having reviewed the record, finds that further development is required. Accordingly, the issue is being REMANDED to the originating agency for the following action: 1. The originating agency should contact the veteran, through his representative, in order to obtain written authorization for the release of his private medical records. After obtaining authorization, the originating agency should request legible copies of his treatment records dated subsequent to August 1989 from Dr. Wallace, Jr. All records obtained should be associated with the veteran's claims file. 2. After the requested medical records have been obtained, the originating agency should schedule the veteran for an orthopedic examination. The express purpose of this examination is to evaluate the current severity of his right knee disability. All necessary tests and studies should be conducted and clinical manifestations should be reported in detail. The report should include active and passive range of motion and include any functional limitation due to pain. The examiner should be given access to the veteran's claims file for a sufficient period of time prior to the examination to allow for a complete review of the record. 3. Upon completion of the above, the originating agency should review this claim. If any determination made is unfavorable to the veteran, a supplemental statement of the case which sets forth the evidence received since the statement of the case should be issued to the veteran and his representative. The veteran and his representative should be given the appropriate period of time in which to respond. Thereafter, the case should be returned to the Board for further appellate consideration, if otherwise in order. The purpose of this REMAND is to obtain clarifying medical information and ensure all due process. No action is required of the veteran until he receives further notice. ALBERT D. TUTERA Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This action has been taken in accordance with the Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-446, § 303, 108 Stat. 4645, ___ (1994), and is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).