BVA9508249 DOCKET NO. 93-19 034 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from decisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Montgomery, Alabama THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased evaluation for chronic lumbosacral strain, currently rated as 10 percent disabling. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: The American Legion WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD T. Hal Smith, Counsel INTRODUCTION At the time of the veteran's separation from service in November 1987, he had a total of approximately 20 years of active duty. This appeal arises from rating decisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Montgomery, Alabama. REMAND The veteran, in essence, contends that a rating in excess of 10 percent is warranted for chronic lumbosacral strain. In particular, he alleges that there has been an increase in back symptomatology as evidenced by recent back surgery. The RO certified the veteran's case for appeal in August 1993. Since then, additional pertinent records, and specifically the report of back surgery (partial hemilaminectomy at L5 with removal of subcapsular disc extrusion at L5-S1) and subsequently dated follow-up reports, have been associated with his claims folder. Under the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 20.1304(c) (1994), pertinent records received under such circumstances "must" be referred to the RO for review and preparation of a supplemental statement of the case "unless this procedural right is waived by the appellant....Such waiver must be in writing...." A review of the claims folder does not reveal that any such waiver has been submitted with regard to these records. Accordingly, this case is REMANDED for the following: 1. The appellant should be afforded a special VA orthopedic examination, in order to ascertain the severity of his current low back disorder. All tests indicated should be performed, and the physician should specify which current low back symptoms are considered part and parcel of the service-connected lumbosacral strain. The report of this examination should be associated with the claims file. 2. The RO is to consider all records received by VA subsequent to the RO's certification of the veteran's claim for appeal in August 1993 and the examination report requested above, and determine whether an increased rating is warranted for chronic lumbosacral strain. If the decision remains adverse to the veteran, he and his representative should be provided with a supplemental statement of the case, and with a reasonable period of time within which to respond thereto. The case should thereafter be returned to the Board for further review, as warranted. The veteran need take no action unless he is so informed. The purpose of this REMAND is to ensure compliance with due process considerations. THOMAS J. DANNAHER Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This action has been taken in accordance with the Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-446, § 303, 108 Stat. 4645, ___ (1994), and is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).