BVA9502450 DOCKET NO. 93-09 037 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Lincoln, Nebraska THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an increased rating for postoperative residuals of a right knee disability, currently evaluated as 10 percent disabling. 2. Entitlement to an increased rating for chondromalacia of the left patella, currently evaluated as 10 percent disabling. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Paralyzed Veterans of America, Inc. WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD B. Anderson, Counsel REMAND The appellant had active duty from October 1986 to August 1990. This appeal arises from a September 1991 rating decision of the Lincoln, Nebraska, regional office (RO). In that decision, secondary service connection for chondromalacia of the left patella was granted and a 10 percent rating for the appellant's right knee disability was continued. In August 1992, a RO hearing officer increased the evaluation assigned for chondromalacia of the left patella from noncompensable to 10 percent disabling. The appellant's local representative has indicated that this was considered to be a partial grant of the benefits sought, whereas the national representative has indicated that this is unclear. A December 1991 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) outpatient clinic progress note shows surgery, apparently for removal of hardware from the appellant's right knee, was scheduled for February 12, 1992. A January 1992 entry shows that the surgery was rescheduled for February 5, 1992. At a hearing conducted at the RO in April 1992, the appellant testified that the surgery had been scheduled for some date in the future, a date which he did not identify. It would be helpful to know the postoperative status of the right knee. To ensure that VA has met its duty to assist the appellant in developing the facts pertinent to the claim, the case is REMANDED to the RO for the following development: 1. The RO should ascertain the date of surgery for removal of hardware from the appellant's right knee and should obtain these records, if available, for association with the claims file. 2. The appellant should be asked to clarify whether he is appealing the grant of a 10 percent evaluation for chondromalacia of the left patella or is satisfied with the evaluation and wishes to withdraw his appeal. 3. The appellant should be afforded a VA orthopedic examination to determine the current extent of postoperative residuals of a right knee disability. If indicated pursuant to the appellant's response to number 2, above, the examination should include evaluation of the current status of chondromalacia of the left patella. The claims folder should be made available to the examiner for in connection with the examination. The knee disabilities should be considered in light of the medical history and any recent time lost from employment due to the knee disabilities should be noted. Clinical findings should be reported in detail, to include any limitation of range of motion, weakness or knee joint instability. After the development requested above has been completed to the extent possible, the RO should again review the record. The appellant and representative should be furnished a supplemental statement of the case and given the applicable opportunity to respond thereto. Thereafter, the case should be returned to the Board, if in order. The Board intimates no opinion as to the ultimate outcome of this case. The appellant need take no action until he is so notified. CHARLES E. HOGEBOOM Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This action has been taken in accordance with the Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-446, § 303, 108 Stat. 4645, ___ (1994), and is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).