BVA9505831 DOCKET NO. 93-14 810 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in San Juan, Puerto Rico THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased evaluation for residuals of trauma to the right knee, currently evaluated as 10 percent disabling. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Moises Rivera Colon, Attorney- at-Law WITNESSES AT HEARING ON APPEAL The appellant and his spouse ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Robert E. O'Brien, Counsel REMAND The veteran had active service from March 1983 to March 1986. This case comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from an October 1991 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in San Juan, Puerto Rico, which confirmed and continued a 10 percent rating for the veteran's right knee disability. The veteran has not been accorded a rating examination with regard to his right knee disability since August 1991. At a hearing in March 1993, the veteran indicated that his right knee symptoms had increased in severity. The Board also notes that in testimony given at the March 1993 hearing, the veteran stated that he had been seen on several occasions during the past several years at the Satellite Clinic in Ponce. There is no recent medical evidence of record from that facility. The Board further notes that not all the pertinent evidence has been translated from Spanish into English. In view of the foregoing, the Board believes that additional development is desirable and the case is REMANDED for the following actions: 1. The RO should contact the veteran and request that he provide the names and addresses of any health care providers who have treated him for his right knee disability in the recent past, specifying the approximate dates of treatment, if possible. Then, after any necessary authorization is obtained from him, the RO should obtain copies of any treatment records identified. The RO should also obtain and associate with the claims file copies of any outpatient treatment records pertaining to the veteran at the VA Satellite Clinic in Ponce, Puerto Rico, in the past several years. 2. A VA orthopedic examination should be arranged to determine the extent and severity of the veteran's right knee disability. The examination should be conducted in accordance with the VA's Physician's Guide for Disability Evaluation Examinations. The examiner should set forth detailed findings regarding limitation of motion and any other functional loss caused by residuals of the trauma to the right knee. Active and passive ranges of motion, in terms of degrees, with the comparison of the opposite side should be reported. The presence or absence of painful motion must be reported. The examiner should also describe any functional loss the veteran may experience as a result of pain, weakness, or fatigability. The claims folder, or copies of all pertinent records, should be made available to the examiner for review. 3. Following completion of the foregoing, the RO must review the claims folder and ensure that the forgoing development has been completed in full. Additionally, it should ensure that all pertinent evidence is translated into English. When the requested development is fully completed, the RO should readjudicate the veteran's claim. The rating decision should reflect consideration of 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1). If the benefit sought is not granted to the veteran's satisfaction, he and his representative should be furnished with a supplemental statement of the case. They should then be afforded the applicable time in which to respond. Thereafter, subject to current appellate procedures, the case should be returned to the Board for further appellate consideration, if otherwise in order. The veteran need take no action until he is further informed. The purpose of this REMAND is to obtain additional information and to ensure due process of law. The Board intimates no opinion as to any final outcome warranted. GARY L. GICK Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a deter- mination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This action has been taken in accordance with the Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-446, § 303, 108 Stat. 4645, ___ (1994), and is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1994).