BVA9504928 DOCKET NO. 93-12 701 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an increased rating for otitis media, currently evaluated 10 percent disabling. 2. Entitlement to an increased (compensable) rating for bilateral defective hearing with tinnitus. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant and spouse. ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Siobhan Brogdon, Counsel REMAND The veteran served on active duty from May 1942 until November 1945. The veteran asserts that his service-connected hearing impairment is more severely disabling than reflected by the currently assigned disability evaluation and warrants a compensable rating. A review of the record discloses that he was most recently afforded a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) audiology examination for compensation and pension purposes in January 1993. The record reflects, however, the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) is unable to properly evaluate the findings of the audiometry portion of that examination to proceed with further adjudication of the claim because a speech recognition score has been inadvertently excised. Under the circumstances of this case, further development is required before final disposition of the issues on appeal. Accordingly the case is REMANDED to the VA Regional Office (RO) for the following action: The veteran should be afforded a current VA audiology examination, to include an audiometry evaluation, in order to determine the extent of all ear-related disability now indicated. The examination summary should be typed and audiometer findings should be reported in the recognized format. Thereafter, the case should be returned to the Board, if in order. The Board intimates no opinion as to the ultimate outcome of this case. The appellant need take no action unless otherwise notified. BRUCE KANNEE Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1994).