BVA9506135 DOCKET NO. 93-14 534 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased rating for arthritis of the hips, currently rated 10 percent disabling. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Mark J. Swiatek, Counsel REMAND The veteran had active duty from January 1958 to April 1978. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) from a July 1991 decision from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The veteran contends, in essence, that the record supports a higher rating for arthritis of the hips. At the hearing, he asserted that a separate evaluation should be assigned for each hip. The record reflects that the claim has been decided without benefit of a contemporaneous, comprehensive VA orthopedic examination. The record includes extensive VA outpatient treatment reports though early 1993, but none of those reflecting treatment for the hips includes an acceptable statement of the range of motion of either hip. Further, an examination ordered after the RO hearing did not address the hips. The record does not allow for an informed determination of the issue on appeal. In view of the foregoing and to ensure that the VA has met its duty to assist the claimant in developing the facts pertinent to the claim and to ensure full compliance with due process requirements, the case is REMANDED to the RO for the following development: 1. The RO should obtain the names and addresses of all medical care providers who treated the veteran recently for a disability of either hip. After securing the necessary release, the RO should obtain those records which have not previously been obtained. 2. The veteran should be afforded a VA orthopedic examination to determine the current severity of his hip disability. The claims folder should be made available to the examiner for review before the examination. The examination report should include a medical history with notation of any time lost from employment due to the service-connected disability. The examiner should include a statement of the range of motion, in degrees, observed for each hip. Any special studies or consultations with other specialists deemed necessary for comprehensive evaluation should be obtained. 3. Thereafter, the RO should readjudicate the issue on appeal to include consideration of 38 C.F.R. § 3.321 (b)(1). Should the matter on appeal not be resolved to the satisfaction of the veteran, a supplemental statement of the case should then be prepared and furnished to the veteran and his representative. They should be provided the applicable period in which to respond. Thereafter, in accordance with the proper appellate procedures, the case should be returned to the Board for further appellate review, if otherwise in order. In taking this action, the Board implies no conclusion, either legal or factual, as to any final outcome warranted. No action is required of the veteran until he is otherwise notified by the RO. CHARLES E. HOGEBOOM Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a deter- mination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This action has been taken in accordance with the Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-446, § 303, 108 Stat. 4645, ___ (1994), and is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1994).