BVA9506446 DOCKET NO. 93-14 053 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Lincoln, Nebraska THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased (compensable) evaluation for a service-connected right knee disorder. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: The American Legion ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Bernard T. DoMinh, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran served on active duty from July 1969 to July 1971 and from January 1976 to January 1980. This matter comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a January 1993 rating decision by the Lincoln, Nebraska, Regional Office (RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), which denied the veteran's claim for an increased (compensable) evaluation for a service-connected right knee disorder. REMAND The veteran had successfully appealed a 1991 denial by the RO of his claim for service connection for a right knee disorder. An August 1992 Board decision granted his appeal, and service connection for the right knee disorder, with degenerative arthritis, was granted in a November 1992 RO decision, effective from September 1990. The evidence of the case indicates that the veteran's service- connected right knee disorder was related to an injury which occurred during his second period of active service, in 1976. In a January 1993 rating decision, the RO assigned a zero percent, noncompensable rating for the veteran's right knee disorder. The rating action was based on the findings of a December 1992 VA examination, during which the veteran complained of having pain on motion of his right knee. Though the examination showed that his knee had full range of motion, and did not appear disabled, the report shows that X-ray films of the right knee were pending, and had not been reviewed by the examining physician when the report was made. The representative has called this issue to the Board's attention, and has requested that, if the veteran's claim for an increased rating could not be granted, that his claim be remanded for further evidentiary development. The Board concurs, mindful that the veteran is service-connected for degenerative arthritis of the right knee, and that, where there is actual pain due to healed injury, he is entitled to at least the minimum compensable rating. 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 (1994). In addition, the veteran contends that his pain is more extensive than when he was examined in December 1992. Therefore, the Board finds that the VA's duty to assist the veteran requires that his case be remanded in order that a complete VA examination, to include X- rays of his right knee, may be performed so that an accurate evaluation of his disability may be made. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.103(a), 3.159 (1994); Littke v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 90 (1990). The case is therefore REMANDED to the RO for the following actions: 1. The RO should ask the veteran to provide a list of all medical care providers (names and addresses and dates of treatment) who treated him for any right knee disorders since separation from his second period of active service in 1980. After securing any necessary releases, the RO should itself directly contact the medical providers and obtain these records, not already on file, following the procedures of 38 C.F.R. § 3.159 (1994). 2. After all records are added to the claims folder, the veteran should undergo a VA orthopedic examination to determine the severity of his right knee disorder. All indicated tests should be performed. X- rays of his right knee must be taken and reviewed by the examiner in the course of the examination, and the claims folder must be made available to and reviewed by the examiner before the examination. Thereafter, the RO should review the claim for an increased rating for a right knee disorder. If the claim is denied, the veteran and his representative should be issued a supplemental statement of the case and given an opportunity to respond. Then the case should be returned to the Board. J. E. DAY Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).