BVA9502204 DOCKET NO. 92-04 240 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in St. Petersburg, Florida THE ISSUE Entitlement to service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: The American Legion WITNESSES AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant and his wife. ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD James A. Pritchett, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active service from September 1966 to September 1969. By rating decision dated in November 1983, service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was denied. An appeal of this decision was not perfected. The claim was reopened in 1990. Because the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) has found new and material evidence has been submitted since the 1983 rating decision, the Board will address the issue of service connection on a de novo basis. This matter comes before the Board on appeal from a rating decision of October 1990, by the St. Petersburg, Florida, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). In March 1993 the case was remanded for further evidentiary development. REMAND It is contended that the veteran has post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a result of active military service. The veteran most recently was examined by a VA psychiatrist in August 1993. Although the diagnosis was PTSD, the report of this examination does not indicate that the examiner had reviewed the claims folder prior to making the diagnosis. The Board observes that VA hospitalization summaries and outpatient treatment records indicate that the veteran's psychiatric condition has been diagnosed as major depression. Accordingly, the case should be remanded to the RO for the following action: 1. Copies of all records of VA in- and outpatient treatment received by the veteran for his psychiatric condition since January 1993 should be obtained and made part of the record. 2. The veteran should be scheduled for a special VA examination by a board of two psychiatrists in order to determine the nature and extent of all current psychiatric pathology. All necessary tests and studies should be accomplished and all clinical manifestations should be reported in detail. Reasons and bases for all diagnoses should be provided in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Physician's Guide for Disability Evaluation Examinations and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition-Revised, Washington, D.C., 1987. All diagnoses should be reconciled with those reported on VA hospitalization and outpatient treatment. The claims folder must be made available to the examiners for review prior to the examination, and the report of the examination should indicate whether it was made available. Once the above development has been completed, the case should again be reviewed by the RO. Should the prior be confirmed, the case should be returned to the Board, if in order. The Board intimates no opinion as to the ultimate outcome of this case. The veteran need take no action unless otherwise notified. WAYNE M. BRAEUER Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).