Citation Nr: 0001151 Decision Date: 01/13/00 Archive Date: 09/08/00 DOCKET NO. 96-42 097 DATE JAN 18, 2000 On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Waco, Texas THE ISSUE Whether the veteran is entitled to vocational rehabilitation services provided under chapter 31, title 38, United States Code. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Kenneth M. Carpenter, Attorney INTRODUCTION The veteran had active military service from January 1942 to December 1944. The veteran brought a timely appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (formerly, the United States Court of Veterans Appeals, hereinafter the Court) from a November 18, 1997, Board decision that denied entitlement to vocational rehabilitation training. The Court vacated the Board's decision and remanded the case to the Board for another decision, taking into consideration matters raised in its order. In May 1999, the Board advised the appellant of the right to submit additional evidence or argument. Additional written argument was received from the appellant's attorney in August 1999. The intertwined issue of the veteran's current eligibility for a program of vocational rehabilitation services is discussed further in the remand portion of this decision. FINDING OF FACT The veteran's PTSD rated 50 percent disabling is the principal disability that results in impairment of his ability to prepare for, obtain, or retain employment consistent with his abilities, aptitudes, and interests. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for entitlement to vocational rehabilitation services have been met. 38 U.S.C.A. 3201, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. 21.40, 21.51 (1999). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION The record shows that the RO in January 1945 after review the veteran's service medical records granted service connection for manic depressive psychosis and rated it 50 percent from December 1944. It was determined that a vocational handicap existed under Pub. L. 16 and he was advised of eligibility. He entered vocational training in late 1945 but this was interrupted in June 1946 and June 1947. His rating was reduced gradually to 30 percent in late 1946 and to 10 percent in 1960. During this period he reported work in a machine shop and as a general - 2 - machine worker through early 1948. He then worked in the aircraft industry and in engineering work until 1960. VA records notes that he attended a university from November 1945 to June 1947. The veteran filed a claim for increase in early 1990 when VA hospitalized him for atrial fibrillation. At the time he was working as a night security guard. He complained in May 1990 that he could not keep a steady job because of a worsening psychiatric disability he identified as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). He also asserted that atrial fibrillation should be service connected on a secondary basis, but a VA examiner in 1990 concluded otherwise. Thus, the RO in late 1990 continued the 10 percent rating for manic depressive psychosis and denied service connection for atrial fibrillation. After notice was issued the next correspondence from the veteran was a claim for increase in late 1992. After variously dated VA medical records were reviewed, the RO in October 1992 continued the 10 percent rating. The veteran was issued written notice in October 1992 and he was next heard from in May 1995. He claimed service connection for PTSD and reported current VA treatment. The record received showed hospitalization in late 1993 for rectal bleeding and outpatient psychiatric treatment from late 1993 for PTSD. The mental hygiene clinic reports note he worked part- time at Wal-Mart and was requesting job training assistance, desiring a job with more hours since his spouse's death. He was described as not handicapped and as having job skills, but as fairly incapacitated from PTSD. He was to contact AARP for additional job training and information on other job programs. The veteran in July 1995 provided a 12-page statement of work history and personal history. On a VA psychiatric examination in October 1995 it was reported that he was employed in security work from 1981 to 1990 and had been unable to work since, apparently from physical and mental problems. He said that he would like to be able to finish college. The examiner found that the overall picture was certainly compatible with an old chronic-PTSD aggravated increasing pain and debility. The diagnosis was PTSD, chronic, moderate with much anxiety and depressive content. 3 - The examiner suspected a rather marked incapacity for employment or social adaptation. The RO in October 1995 rated the veteran's psychiatric disability, now diagnosed as PTSD, 50 percent from May 1995. Atrial fibrillation was listed on the rating sheet as a nonservice- connected disability. The RO in November 1995 notified the veteran of the rating determination. He filed an application for VA Vocational rehabilitation assistance in January 1996 noting that he had previously received VA vocational rehabilitation assistance in 1946 and 1947. He requested assistance or services to attend college or vocational school. The veteran received an initial VA vocational rehabilitation assessment in February 1996. He provided a resume showing engineering and teaching experience, work in sales, programming and security. He expressed an interest in completing college and in a computer science degree. The narrative report of the counseling record discussed the veteran's eligibility for vocational rehabilitation under chapter 31. His history was thoroughly reviewed from the standpoint of work experience and education. The report noted the 50 percent rating for PTSD and the VA examiner's opinion as to the extent of impairment. The rating criteria then in effect that corresponded to the 50 percent rating were also noted. It was the conclusion of the reporter that most would determine that the evidence on file did indicate that the veteran had in impairment of employability that was a direct result of his service-connected disability. It was felt that this disabling condition could be overcome as was indicated by the veteran's resume and employment history. It appeared that he had overcome the limitations imposed by the disability as he had worked steadily and reliably to earn a Social Security retirement income for approximately the previous 12 years. The counseling psychologist felt that the veteran had sufficient skills to perform part-time and limited time employment without further training. It was stated that by having those skills the reporter was bound to determine that his disability condition did not cause an employment handicap, which prevents his seeking, 4 - obtaining or maintaining vocations, which he had previously practiced. It was felt that he was unemployed for reasons of his own and chose to pursue college training rather than employment. It was also noted that the veteran's eligibility termination date for vocational rehabilitation was in January 1957. In conclusion it was determined that he had no employment handicap and that his eligibility termination date was January 9, 1957. The veteran was advised of the determination by letter dated in February 1996 from the VA Vocational Rehabilitation & Counseling Officer. Criteria The purposes of this program are to provide to eligible veterans with compensable service-connected disabilities all services and assistance necessary to enable them to achieve maximum independence in daily living and, to the maximum extent feasible, to become employable and to obtain and maintain suitable employment. (b) Basic requirements. Before a service-disabled veteran may receive training and rehabilitation services under Chapter 31, Title 38 U.S.C., three basic requirements must be met: (1) The Department of Veterans Affairs must first find that the veteran has basic entitlement to services as prescribed by Sec. 21.40. (2) The services necessary for training and rehabilitation must be identified by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the veteran. (3) An individual written plan must be developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the veteran describing the goals of the program and the means through which these goals will be achieved. 38 C.F.R. 21.1. 5 - The term "employment handicap" means an impairment of a veteran's ability to prepare for, obtain, or retain employment consistent with such veteran's abilities, aptitudes, and interests. 38 C.F.R. 21.35. Eligibility for initial evaluation. VA shall provide an initial evaluation to each individual who applies for benefits under chapter 31 if the individual's compensable service-connected disability meets one of the conditions contained in Sec. 21.40(a). An initial evaluation will be provided to each individual who meets the conditions of paragraph (a) of this section to: (1) Determine the existence of an employment handicap; (2) Determine the basic twelve-year period of eligibility; (3) Determine whether an employment handicap shall be considered a serious employment handicap; (4) Determine whether the basic twelve-year period of eligibility is extended for a veteran with a serious employment handicap; (5) Determine as expeditiously is possible, without extended evaluation, whether achievement of a vocational goal is currently reasonably feasible. (6) Evaluate the ability of the veteran to live and function independently within the veteran's family and community; (7) Determine if the veteran is eligible for employment services under Sec. 21.47; (8) Develop information necessary to plan an individual program for a veteran found eligible and entitled to services under Chapter 31; and (9) Assist a veteran who is found ineligible for assistance under Chapter 31 to identify other resources and programs for which he or she may be eligible. The initial evaluation shall include consideration of. (1) The handicapping effects of the veteran's service-connected disability on employability and independence in daily living; (2) The veteran's residual physical and mental capabilities which contribute to employability and independence in daily living; (3) The veteran's ability to function independently in family and community; (4) Prior assessments of employability by a counseling psychologist; (5) Assessments authorized to provide additional information necessary for initial evaluation; and (6) The veteran's personal history including: (i) Education and training; (ii) Employment; (iii) Nonservice-connected disability (ies), and (iv) Family and community adjustment. 6 - All determinations regarding service requirements for basic entitlement and, the beginning and ending dates of a veteran's basic twelve-year period of eligibility shall be made by appropriate staff of the Adjudication Division. (2) all other determinations, including extension of the basic twelve-year period because of serious employment handicap, and entitlement to assistance under Chapter 31 shall be made by appropriate staff of the Vocational Rehabilitation and Counseling Division. The cooperation of the veteran is essential to an initial evaluation. The purpose of the initial evaluation and the steps in the process shall be explained to the veteran and his or her Cooperation requested. If the veteran does not cooperate in the initiation or completion of the initial evaluation the counseling psychologist shall make a reasonable effort through counseling to secure the veteran's cooperation. If the veteran's cooperation cannot be secured, the counseling psychologist shall suspend the initial evaluation until such time as the veteran cooperates. The veteran will be informed of any suspension of the initial evaluation, the reasons for this action, and the steps necessary to resume the evaluation. 38 C.F.R. 21.50. The proper determination of employment handicap is a critical decision for rehabilitation planning and program accountability. To the extent possible, necessary information shall be developed in the course of initial evaluation and the significance of the information under paragraphs (d) and (e) of this Section for determining employment handicap shown in each case. The term employment handicap means an impairment of the veteran.'s ability to prepare for, obtain, or retain employment consistent with the veteran's abilities, aptitudes, and interests. Components of an employment handicap include: (1) Impairment. This term means the restrictions on employability caused by: (i) The veteran's service and nonservice-connected disabilities; (ii) Deficiencies in education and training; (iii) Negative attitudes toward the disabled; and (iv) Other pertinent factors. - 7 - The veteran's service-connected disability need not be the sole or primary cause of the employment handicap but it must materially contribute to the impairment described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. Therefore its effects must be identifiable, measurable, or observable. Nonservice-connected disability. This term includes all physical and mental disabilities which have not been found to be service- connected by the Department of Veterans Affairs, including alcoholism and drug abuse. The effects of alcoholism and drug abuse are to be considered in the same manner as other nonservice- connected disabilities in evaluating restrictions on employability. When the manifestations of alcoholism, drug abuse or other nonservice-connected disabilities raise questions as to the reasonable feasibility of a vocational goal for a veteran otherwise entitled to assistance under Chapter 31 such questions will be resolved under provisions of Sec. 21.53. (4) Consistency with abilities, aptitudes, and interests. The Following points should be considered to determine if the veteran's training and employment are consistent with his or her abilities, aptitudes and interests: (i) A finding that a veteran is employed in an occupation which is consistent with his or her abilities, aptitudes and interests may not be made if the occupation does not require reasonably developed skills except under conditions described in paragraphs (e) (2) and (3), of this section; (ii) The veteran's residual capacities, as well as limitations arising from the veteran's service and nonservice-connected disabilities are relevant; (iii) Evidence of the consistency of interests with training and employment may be based on: (A) The veteran's statements to a Department of Veterans Affairs counseling psychologist during initial evaluation or subsequent reevaluation; (B) The veteran's history of participation in specific activities; or (C) Information developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs through use of interest inventories. (d) Determining extent of impairment. The extent of the veterans impairment shall be assessed through consideration of factors described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section: - 8 - (e) Material contribution of service-connected disability to the impairment. A finding that the veteran's service-connected disability materially contributes to his or her impairment to employment will be made by assessing the following factors: (1) Preparation for employment. The service-connected condition adversely affects the veteran's current ability to prepare for employment in one or more fields which would otherwise be consistent with the veteran's abilities, aptitudes, and interests. An adverse effect is demonstrated when the physical or psychological results of the service-connected condition: (i) impair the veteran's ability to train; (ii) Prevent or impede access to training facilities; or (iii) Diminish the veteran's motivation and ability to mobilize his or her energies for education or training. (2) Obtaining employment. The service-connected condition places the veteran at a competitive disadvantage with similarly circumstanced nondisabled persons in obtaining employment. A veteran without reasonably developed specific job skills shall be considered to be at a competitive disadvantage unless evidence of record shows a history of current, stable, continuing employment. (3) Retaining employment. The physical or psychological effects of a service- connected condition adversely affect the veteran's ability to maintain employment which requires reasonably developed skills. This criterion is not met if a veteran though lacking reasonably developed skills, has a history of continuing, stable employment. (f) Determination of employment handicap. The counseling psychologist may find the veteran has an employment handicap. (1) An employment handicap which entitles the veteran to assistance under this program exists when all of the following conditions are met: (i) The veteran has an impairment of employability; this includes veterans who are qualified for suitable employment, but do not obtain or retain such employment for reasons not within their control; (ii) The veteran's service-connected disability materially contributes to the impairment of employability; (iii) The veteran has not overcome the effects of the impairment of - 9 - employability through employment in an occupation consistent with his or her pattern of abilities, aptitudes and interests. (2) An employment handicap does not exist when any of the Following conditions is present: (i) The veteran's employability is not impaired; this includes veterans who are qualified for suitable employment, but do not obtain or retain such employment for reasons within their control; (ii) The veteran's employability is impaired, but his or her service-connected disability does not materially contribute to the impairment of employability. (iii) The veteran has overcome the effects of the impairment of employability through employment in an occupation consistent with his or her pattern of abilities, aptitudes and interests, and is successfully maintaining such employment. (g) Eligibility for employment assistance. If a veteran is not found to have an employment handicap a separate determination of his or her eligibility for employment assistance will be made under provisions of Sec. 21.47. (h) Responsibility for determinations. The determination of an employment handicap and eligibility for employment assistance may only be made by a counseling psychologist in the Vocational Rehabilitation and Counseling Division. 38 C.F.R. 21.51. A veteran or serviceperson shall be entitled to a program of rehabilitation services under 38 U.S.C. chapter 31 if all of the following conditions are met: (a) Service- connected disability. (1) The veteran has a service-connected disability of 20 percent or more which is, or but for the receipt of retired pay would be, compensable under 38 U.S.C. chapter 11, and which was incurred or aggravated in service on or after September 16, 1940; or (2) A serviceperson is hospitalized for a service-connected disability in a hospital over which the Secretary concerned has charge pending discharge or release from active military, naval or air service and is suffering from a disability which will likely be compensable It a rate of 20 percent or more under 38 U.S. C. Chapter 11; or (3) A veteran or serviceperson, as described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section, has a service-connected 10 - disability which is compensable or is likely to be compensable at less than 20 percent, if the individual filed an original application for Chapter 31 before November 1, 1990. (b) Employment handicap. The veteran or serviceperson is determined to be in need of rehabilitation to overcome an employment handicap. 38 C.F.R. 21.40. Basic period of eligibility. A veteran having basic entitlement may be provided a program of rehabilitative services during the twelve- year period following discharge. The beginning date of the twelve- year period is the day of the veteran's discharge or release from his or her last period of active military, naval, or air service and the ending date is twelve years from the discharge or release date, unless the beginning date is deferred or the ending date is deferred or extended as provided in Secs. 21.42, 21.44, and 21.45. 38 C.F.R. 21.41. The basic twelve-year period of eligibility does not begin to run if the veteran was prevented from beginning or continuing a vocational rehabilitation program for one of the following reasons: (a) Qualifying compensable service-connected disability established. The basic twelve-year period shall not begin to run until the veteran establishes the existence of a compensable service-connected disability described in Sec. 21.40(a). When the veteran establishes the existence of a compensable service- connected disability described in Sec. 21.40(a), the basic twelve- year period begins on the day the Department of Veterans Affairs notifies the veteran of this. The ending date is twelve years from the beginning date. Medical condition prevents initiation or continuation. (1) The basic 12-year period of eligibility shall not begin to run or continue to run during any period of 30 days or more in which the veteran's participation in vocational rehabilitation is infeasible because of the veteran's medical condition, which condition may include the disabling effects of chronic alcoholism, subject to paragraph (c)(5) of this section. The 12-year period shall begin or resume when it is feasible for the veteran to participate in a vocational rehabilitation program, as that term is defined in Sec. 21.35. 38 C.F.R. 21.42. The basic period of eligibility of a veteran with a serious employment handicap may be extended when the veteran's employment and particular handicap necessitate an extension as necessary to pursue a vocational rehabilitation program under the following conditions: (a) Not rehabilitated to the point of employability. The basic period of eligibility may be extended when the veteran has not previously been rehabilitated to the point of employability. (b) Rehabilitated to the point of employability. The veteran was previously declared rehabilitated to the point of employability, under the Department of Veterans Affairs vocational rehabilitation program, but either: (1) The veteran's service- connected disability or disabilities have worsened to the extent that he or she is unable to perform the duties of the occupation in which he or she is trained, or in a related occupation; or (2) The occupation in which the veteran was rehabilitated to the point of employability is not presently suitable in view of the veteran's current employment handicap and capabilities. (The finding of unsuitability must be based upon objective evidence developed in the course of reconsideration which. shows that the nature or extent of the veteran's employment handicap and his or her capabilities are significantly different than were previously found.) or; (3) Occupational requirements have changed and additional services are needed to help the veteran continue in the occupation in which he or she was trained or in a related field. 38 C.F.R. 21.44. The period of eligibility for a veteran to pursue a program of independent living services may be extended beyond the basic twelve-year period under the following conditions: (a) The veteran's medical condition (service and nonservice- connected disabilities) is so severe that achievement of a vocational goal is not currently reasonably feasible, or (b) the extension is necessary to ensure that he or she will achieve maximum independence in daily living. 38 C.F.R. 21.45. Providing employment services to veterans eligible for a rehabilitation program under chapter 31. Each veteran, other than one found in need of a program of - 12 - independent living services and assistance, who is otherwise currently eligible for and entitled to participate in a program of rehabilitation under chapter 31 may receive employment services. Included are those veterans who: (1) Have completed a program of rehabilitation services under chapter 31 and been declared rehabilitated to the point of employability; (2) Have not completed a period of rehabilitation to the point of employability under chapter 31, but: (i) Have elected to secure employment without completing the period of rehabilitation to the point of employability; and (ii) Are employable; or (3) Have never received services for rehabilitation to the point of employability under chapter:31 if they: (i) Are employable or employed in a suitable occupation; (ii) Have an employment handicap or a serious employment handicap; and (iii) Need employment services to secure and/or maintain suitable employment. (b) Veteran previously participated in a VA vocational rehabilitation program or a similar program under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. A veteran who at some time in the past has participated in a vocational rehabilitation program under chapter 31 or a similar program under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and is employable is eligible for employment services under the following conditions even though he or she is ineligible for any other assistance under chapter 31: (1) The veteran is employable in a suitable occupation. (2) The veteran has filed a claim for vocational rehabilitation or employment assistance; (3) The veteran meets the criteria for eligibility described in Sec. 21.40(a); and (4) The veteran has an employment handicap or serious employment handicap; and - 13 - (5) The veteran: (i) Completed a vocational rehabilitation program under 38 U.S.C. ch. 31 or participated in such a program for at least 90 days on or after September 16, 1940; or (ii.) Completed a vocational rehabilitation program under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 after September 26, 1975, or participated in such a program which included at least 90 days of postsecondary education or vocational training. (c) Veteran never received vocational rehabilitation services from the Department of Veterans Affairs or under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. If a veteran is currently ineligible under chapter 31 because he or she does not have an employment handicap, and has never before participated in a vocational rehabilitation program under chapter 31 or under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, no employment assistance may now be provided to the veteran under chapter 31. (d) Duration of period of employment assistance. The periods during which employment assistance may be provided are not subject to limitations on periods of eligibility for -vocational rehabilitation provided in Secs. 21.41 through 21.45 of this part, but entitlement to such assistance is, as provided in Sec. 21.73 of this part, limited to 18 total months of assistance. 38 C.F.R. 21.47. Analysis The Board observes that the argument on behalf of the appellant has focused upon the existence of an employment handicap to establish entitlement to VA vocational rehabilitation services. Before a service-disabled veteran may receive training and rehabilitation services basic requirements that must be met include basic entitlement to services. The veteran meet the element of service connected disability rated at least 20 percent disabling. He must also establish the existence of art employment handicap. Initially the Board finds the claim well grounded as the veteran meets basic entitlement criteria. He had also provided evidence of a goal and a means of achieving it. See Kandik v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 434, 438 (1996). - 14 - The term employment handicap contemplates an impairment of the veteran's ability to prepare for, obtain, or retain employment consistent with the veteran's abilities, aptitudes, and interests. The Board is persuaded that he currently has such a handicap. It would appear the service-connected psychiatric disorder now rated 50 percent and other disabilities noted in the record would result in restrictions on employability. Indeed, it cannot be argued reasonably the considerable impairment contemplated in the current rating would not, alone, result in such restrictions. The veteran apparently had some college level training after service and worked for a significant time: in the aircraft industry. Now, however, it would appear that he has been able to work only in less technical or demanding work. What he had been able to do years ago is not necessarily indicative of what he is able to do now, particularly with the significant increase in his psychiatric disability. It appears that the counseling evaluation tended to give significant weight to past achievements that were accomplished when the psychiatric disability was less of a factor. The rating was gradually reduced over a period of years and remained 10 percent until recently when It was increased to 50 percent An employment handicap exists as in cannot reasonably be disputed that the veteran has an impairment of employability that is a result of the psychiatric disability. At the present time it is not shown that he has overcome the effects of the impairment of employability through employment in an occupation consistent with his or her pattern of abilities, aptitudes and interests. Here, the Board must observe that by regulation a psychiatric disability rated at least 30 percent would establish a serious employment handicap. So it is difficult to argue that a higher rated psychiatric disability would not establish, at a minimum, an employment handicap. 38 C.F.R. 21.52. In summary, having reviewed the counseling record in the context of the entire evidentiary record, the Board does find the evidence establishes that the veteran's employability is impaired currently on account of service-connected disability and that the veteran has at this time overcome the effects of the impairment of employability through employment in an occupation consistent with his or her pattern of abilities, aptitudes and interests, and is successfully maintaining such 15 - employment. See Davenport v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 476, 486 (1995). The present level of psychiatric impairment under the former criteria contemplated considerable impairment. Under the current rating scheme, the 50 percent rating (contemplates reduced reliability and productivity and difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work relationships. The VA examiner in 1995 suspected a rather marked incapacity for employment. The Board's decision that the veteran has established basic entitlement to a program of vocational rehabilitation services addresses the issue remanded by the Court and briefed by appellant's attorney. However, the intertwined issue of basic eligibility cannot be overlooked. This was mentioned in the counseling records, but additional development as discussed below is felt to be necessary for an informed determination. ORDER The veteran having established basic entitlement to vocational rehabilitation services provided under chapter 31, title 3 8, United States Code, the appeal is granted to this extent. REMAND The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter or matters the Board has remanded to the regional office. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). This claim mu.st be afforded expeditious treatment by the RO. The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the Board of Veterans' Appeals or by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for additional development or other appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner. See The Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-446, 302, 108 Stat. 4645, - 16 - 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. 5101 (West Supp. 1999) (Historical and Statutory Notes). In addition, VBA's Adjudication Procedure Manual, M21-1, Part IV, directs the ROs to provide expeditious handling of all cases that have been remanded by the Board and the Court. See M21-1, Part IV, paras. 8.44-8.45 and 38.02-38.03. As noted previously, the veteran has established basic entitlement to vocational rehabilitation services. However, the intertwined issue of eligibility for vocational rehabilitation services must be addressed before there is any obligation to expend additional vocational rehabilitation resources. It was apparently assumed that the veteran met the eligibility criteria for vocational rehabilitation assistance in 1995. However, he had previously used entitlement after service in the late 1940's having met the eligibility criteria at the time. The regulations provide under section 21.41 that a veteran having basic entitlement may be provided a program of rehabilitative services during the twelve-year period following discharge. The beginning date of the twelve-year period is the day of the veteran's discharge or release from his or her last period of active military, naval, or air service and the ending date is twelve years from the discharge or release date, unless the beginning date is deferred or the ending date is deferred or extended as provided in Secs. 21.42, 21.44, and 21.45. All determinations regarding service requirements for basic entitlement and, the beginning and ending dates of a veteran's basic twelve-year period of eligibility shall be made by appropriate staff of the Adjudication Division. This element was apparently not completed in 1995. The initial period of eligibility may be extended in certain circumstances and the veteran may also be eligible for other assistance but the determinations necessary to establish entitlement or eligibility must be made by staff of the Vocational Rehabilitation and Counseling Division. - 17 - The veteran was enrolled in a VA vocational rehabilitation training program beginning in November 1945 when his psychiatric disability was railed 50 percent; training was interrupted in 1946 and 1947. It is noted in the counselling report that his eligibility period for rehabilitative services concluded in December 1957. However, the staff person who completed the interview apparently did not have complete information regarding the veteran's earlier training program. To insure due process, the case is remanded for the following action: 1. The RO should advise the veteran and his attorney of the opportunity to submit any additional evidence or argument on the matter of eligibility for VA vocational rehabilitation services. 2. The staff of the Adjudication Division and Vocational Rehabilitation and Counseling Division show review the matter of the veteran's eligibility for vocational rehabilitation services in accordance with the eligibility criteria as set forth, for example, in 38 C.F.R. 21.41, 21.42, 21.44, 21.50(d) and 21.186. 3. The appropriate staff personnel should also review and associate with the claims folder any records available from the veteran's initial period of vocational rehabilitation training so that the current eligibility review might discuss the significance to the current claim of interrupted or discontinued training status (38 C.F.R. 21.197 and 21.198) in 1946 and 1947 and the veteran's current eligibility to any vocational rehabilitation services. 4. Thereafter, the RO should review the claims file to insure that all of the requested development has been - 18 - completed and ensure that it is in complete compliance with the directives of this remand. If not, the RO should implement corrective procedures. Stegall v. West, 11 Vet. App. 268 (1998). 5. After undertaking any development deemed essential in addition to that specified above, the RO should adjudicate the intertwined issue of the veteran's eligibility for a program of vocational rehabilitation services. If the benefit is not granted, the RO should issue a supplemental statement of the case. The applicable period of time for a response should be afforded. Thereafter, the case should be returned to the Board for appellate review, if otherwise in order. By this remand the Board intimates no opinion as to any final outcome warranted. The veteran need take no action until he is notified. Mark J. Swiatek Acting Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals - 19 -