BVA9500312 DOCKET NO. 93-03 136 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in St. Petersburg, Florida THE ISSUE Whether a Social Security Administration adjustment payment of retroactive benefits is properly considered as countable income for purposes of improved pension benefits. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD S. L. Kennedy, Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran served on active duty from January 1945 to January 1946. This matter came before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from an August 1992 decision of the St. Petersburg, Florida, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). The notice of disagreement was received in September 1992. The statement of the case was issued in November 1992. The substantive appeal was received in December 1992. In December 1993, the Board received from the veteran a VA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim) with several attached medical statements which appear to be unrelated to the current appeal. Those documents are referred to the RO for appropriate disposition. CONTENTIONS OF APPELLANT ON APPEAL The veteran contends that the entire amount of a lump-sum payment of retroactive benefits from the Social Security Administration (SSA) should not be considered countable income for purposes of the payment of VA improved pension benefits. He asserts that the lump-sum SSA payment represented retroactive benefits that should have been paid to him between 1988 and 1991, and that since he did not file a claim for VA pension benefits until early 1991, then only the portion of the SSA lump-sum adjustment from that date onward should be considered as income for VA pension purposes. He maintains that if the $1,200 in question is prorated from January 1988 to July 1992, then only approximately $371 should be considered countable income for 1992. DECISION OF THE BOARD The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (West 1991), has reviewed and considered all of the evidence and material of record in the veteran's claims file. Based on its review of the relevant evidence in this matter, and for the following reasons and bases, it is the decision of the Board that the preponderance of the evidence is against the veteran's claim to exclude any portion of the Social Security Administration adjustment payment of retroactive benefits as countable income for purposes of improved pension benefits FINDINGS OF FACT 1. In an October 1991 rating decision, the veteran was awarded improved pension benefits effective from February 11, 1991. This award, of which he was notified by VA letter dated in November 1991, was based on his SSA benefit of $262 per month, and $282 per month in annuity/retirement benefits, and his spouse's SSA benefit of $282 per month. Several subsequent adjustments were made with respect to the veteran's countable income and corresponding changes were made to the amount of pension paid to the veteran of which he was notified by VA letters dated in December 1991, and in April 1992. 2. In August 1992, the veteran submitted a VA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim), in which he referred to an attached SSA letter and in which he requested an adjustment of his benefits. The attached SSA letter indicated that shortly after August 2, 1992, the veteran would receive a payment of $1,486 which represented retroactive benefits that should have been paid to him as well as his regular monthly payment of $286. A subsequently received SSA letter indicated that the retroactive payment represented benefits that should have been paid to the veteran between 1988 and 1991. 3. The veteran's award of improved pension benefits was adjusted to include the additional $1,200 received from the SSA as countable income effective from September 1, 1992. CONCLUSION OF LAW The entire amount of the Social Security Administration adjustment payment of retroactive benefits was properly considered as countable income for purposes of improved pension benefits. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1503, 1521, 5107 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.23, 3.271, 3.272 (1991). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION At the outset, the Board finds that the appellant's claim is well grounded within the meaning of 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(a) (West 1991). That is, the Board finds that he has presented a claim which is plausible. The Board is also satisfied that all relevant facts have been properly developed and that the VA has fulfilled its duty to assist the appellant as mandated by 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107 (West 1991) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.103(a) (1993). In an October 1991 rating decision, the veteran was awarded improved pension benefits effective from February 11, 1991. This award, of which he was notified by VA letter dated in November 1991, was based on his SSA benefit of $262 per month, and $282 per month in annuity/retirement benefits, and his spouse's SSA benefit of $282 per month. Several subsequent adjustments were made with respect to the veteran's countable income and corresponding changes were made to the amount of pension paid to the veteran of which he was notified by VA letters dated in December 1991, and in April 1992. The record reflects that the veteran was paid various rates of improved pension from March 1, 1991. In August 1992, the RO received information from the veteran which indicated that he was to receive a lump-sum payment from SSA which represented a retroactive award of benefits that should have been, but had not been, paid to him. The veteran submitted a VA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim), with an attached SSA letter which indicated that shortly after August 2, 1992, the veteran would receive a payment of $1,486 which included the retroactive benefits as well as his regular monthly payment of $286. A subsequently received SSA letter indicated that the retroactive payment represented benefits that should have been paid to the veteran between 1988 and 1991. Based on this information, the veteran's award of improved pension benefits was adjusted to include the additional $1,200 ($1,486 minus his monthly SSA payment of $286 which had already been counted as income for the period in question) received from the SSA as countable income, effective from September 1, 1992. Under the applicable governing legal criteria, the maximum rate of improved pension is reduced by the amount of the countable income of the veteran. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1521 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.23 (1993). In determining income for purposes of entitlement to pension under the improved pension program, payments of any kind from any source are counted as income during the 12-month annualization period in which received unless specifically excluded under 38 C.F.R. § 3.272 (1993). 38 U.S.C.A. § 1503 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.271 (1993). In this case, the veteran received the income in question from the SSA. Although a number of exclusions from countable income are set forth under 38 C.F.R. § 3.272, such as welfare payments, the value of maintenance furnished by a relative, friend or charitable organization, and the profit from the sale of property under certain circumstances, the type of benefit received by the veteran from SSA is not listed among the exclusions. Therefore, it is apparent that the sum of $1,200 was properly included as countable income for purposes of the veteran's improved pension benefits. In this particular case, the veteran asserts that the entire amount of a lump-sum payment of retroactive benefits from the Social Security Administration (SSA) should not be considered countable income for purposes of the payment of VA improved pension benefits. He asserts that the lump-sum SSA payment represented retroactive benefits that should have been paid to him between 1988 and 1991, and that since he did not file a claim for VA pension benefits until early 1991, then only the portion of the SSA lump-sum adjustment from that date onward should be considered as income for VA pension purposes. He maintains that if the $1,200 in question is prorated from January 1988 to July 1992, then only approximately $371 should be included in his countable income for 1992. However, when the facts of this case are considered in light of the governing legal criteria, the Board is unable to concur with the veteran's contentions. The record clearly reflects that the $1,200 SSA payment represented benefits which the veteran was entitled to for periods prior to 1992. The law provides that income is counted during the 12-month annualization period when it is "received," not when the veteran was entitled to it. While the SSA payment was for benefits due for previous months, the date of the actual receipt of the payment is the only factor to be considered when determining countable income for VA purposes. Thus, the RO properly included the $1,200 lump-sum SSA payment as countable income, and the veteran's improved pension benefits were properly reduced for the period in question. The Board has carefully reviewed the entire record in this case, but finds no doubt as to any material issue. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b) (West 1991). ORDER The appeal is denied. EUGENE A. O'NEILL Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) NOTICE OF APPELLATE RIGHTS: Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7266 (West 1991), a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals granting less than the complete benefit, or benefits, sought on appeal is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals within 120 days from the date of mailing of notice of the decision, provided that a Notice of Disagreement concerning an issue which was before the Board was filed with the agency of original jurisdiction on or after November 18, 1988. Veterans' Judicial Review Act, Pub. L. No. 100-687, § 402 (1988). The date which appears on the face of this decision constitutes the date of mailing and the copy of this decision which you have received is your notice of the action taken on your appeal by the Board of Veterans' Appeals.