Citation Nr: 0004316 Decision Date: 02/17/00 Archive Date: 02/23/00 DOCKET NO. 99-23 629 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in New Orleans, Louisiana THE ISSUE Entitlement to an effective date earlier than February 2, 1999, for the award of service connection for a pain disorder. ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD P.M. DiLorenzo, Counsel FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The veteran in this case served on active duty from July 1983 to October 1984. 2. On January 7, 2000, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the veteran that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of a Notice of Disagreement and/or Substantive Appeal by the appellant have been met. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 20.202, 20.204 (1999). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105, the Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. A Notice of Disagreement may be withdrawn in writing before a timely Substantive Appeal is filed. A Substantive Appeal may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. §§ 20.202, 20.204(a), (b) (1999). Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative, except that a representative may not withdraw either a Notice of Disagreement or a Substantive Appeal filed by the appellant personally without the express written consent of the appellant. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204(c) (1999). In August 1999, the RO granted service connection for a pain disorder, evaluated as 30 percent disabling, effective from February 2, 1999. The veteran was notified of the RO's decision by means of an August 13, 1999, letter. He submitted a notice of disagreement to the RO concerning the effective date of the award on September 9, 1999. A statement of the case addressing this claim was issued on October 26, 1999. A VA Form 9 with "N/A" written on it was thereafter received at the RO on October 28, 1999. In a written statement received at the Board on January 7, 2000, the veteran stated that he wanted to withdraw his appeal. The appellant has withdrawn this appeal and, hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed without prejudice. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. J. SHERMAN ROBERTS Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals