BVA9502388 DOCKET NO. 93-12 342 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in No. Little Rock, Arkansas THE ISSUE Entitlement to service connection for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: The American Legion WITNESSES AT HEARING ON APPEAL The appellant and his ex-wife ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Jeffrey A. Pisaro, Counsel REMAND The veteran had active service from August 1967 to August 1969. This appeal arises from a December 1992 rating decision of the North Little Rock, Arkansas, Regional Office (RO). The veteran received the Combat Infantryman Badge for his service in Vietnam, and a hearing officer in a March 1993 decision found that the veteran's testimony concerning combat experiences was credible. Service connection for PTSD was denied as a diagnosis of PTSD had not been made. On VA psychiatric examination in October 1992, the examiner noted that the veteran showed some evidence of PTSD, but his major complaint centered around dizzy spells with forgetfulness. It was opined that a final conclusion could be reached on an outpatient basis, and no diagnosis was provided. The veteran was hospitalized by VA for observation and evaluation from October to November 1992. The discharge diagnosis was dementia. Neuropsychological testing was scheduled following discharge, but no report of such testing or the significance of the results, if conducted, is of record. Under the circumstances of this case, the Board finds that further assistance is required. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED to the RO for the following actions: 1. The RO should contact the veteran and obtain the names and addresses of all health care providers where he has received evaluation or treatment for psychiatric disability in recent years, including the planned VA psychological testing in November 1992. Thereafter, the RO should obtain legible copies of all records which have not already been obtained. 2. Following completion of above development, the veteran should be afforded a comprehensive VA examination in psychiatry. This study should be conducted in accordance with the VA Physician's Guide for Disability Evaluation Examinations. All indicated tests, including appropriate psychological studies, must be conducted. The claims file must be made available to and reviewed by the examiner in connection with the examination. The examination report should include diagnoses, and the examiner should express an opinion as to whether the veteran suffers from PTSD as a result of his wartime experiences in Vietnam. A complete rationale for the diagnostic opinion should be provided. 3. Following completion of the foregoing, the RO must review the claims folder and ensure that all of the foregoing development actions have been conducted and completed. If any development is incomplete, appropriate corrective action is to be implemented. If the decision remains adverse to the veteran, he and his representative should be furnished with a supplemental statement of the case. They should then be afforded the applicable time to respond. Thereafter, subject to current appellate procedures, the case should be returned to the Board for further appellate consideration, if appropriate. The veteran need take no action until he is further informed. The purpose of this REMAND is to obtain additional information and to ensure due process of law. No inference should be drawn regarding the final disposition of the claim as a result of this action. CHARLES E. HOGEBOOM Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This action has been taken in accordance with the Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-446, § 303, 108 Stat. 4645, ___ (1994), and is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).