BVA9504308 DOCKET NO. 93-12 113 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in St. Petersburg, Florida THE ISSUES Entitlement to service connection for the cause of the veteran's death. Entitlement to effective date prior to September 1, 1992 for a grant of nonservice-connected death pension benefits. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: AMVETS ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Robert A. Leaf, Counsel REMAND The veteran had verified active service from November 1965 to November 1987; a prior period of unverified service, beginning in 1961 has been reported. A September 1992 rating decision of the St. Petersburg, Florida, Regional Office (RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denied service connection for the cause of the veteran's death; in October 1992, the appellant was awarded death pension benefits, effective September 1, 1992. The appellant, the veteran's widow, has appealed both actions. This appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals stems from that rating decision. The appellant asserts that the veteran's fatal carcinoma of the gallbladder had its onset during his military service and claims that an autopsy report indicates that it was "a longstanding cancer." The death certificate shows that the veteran died in December 1991 from metastatic carcinoma of the gallbladder, with an approximate interval of 3 months between onset and death. It also relates that an autopsy was performed. The report of that autopsy is not of record. The veteran was hospitalized at a private medical facility where biopsies of the omentum and left femur were performed in February 1991. Any tissue blocks or slides prepared following the biopsies are not of record. In addition, if the veteran was hospitalized or under treatment at the time of death, a report of the terminal hospitalization or other treatment is not of record. The Board has a duty to assist the appellant in the development of facts pertinent to her claim. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107 (West 1991). Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following actions: 1. The RO should request the appellant to provide, if applicable, the name and address of any physician or hospital providing treatment to the veteran at the time of his death. After securing the necessary authorization, the RO should obtain available records from the named medical sources. 2. The RO should request a copy of the veteran's autopsy report from the Office of Vital Statistics or the Office of the Medical Examiner for the State of Florida. 3. The RO should request the American International Hospital, Shiloh Boulevard & Emmaus Avenue, Zion, Illinois, to send any tissue slides or blocks obtained from biopsies the veteran underwent at that facility. 4. Thereafter, the RO should again review the appellant's claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death. If the decision remains adverse to the appellant, a supplemental statement of the case should be furnished and she and her representative provided an opportunity for response. The case should then be returned to the Board for further appellate consideration, if otherwise in order. The appellant need take no action until she is notified. By this action, the Board intimates no opinion as to the ultimate decision warranted in this case. Appellate consideration of the issue of entitlement to an effective date prior to September 1, 1992 for a grant of nonservice-connected death pension benefits is deferred pending the development described above. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) N. R. ROBIN Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).