Citation Nr: 0004148 Decision Date: 02/16/00 Archive Date: 02/23/00 DOCKET NO. ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office in Houston, Texas THE ISSUE Whether a request for waiver of recovery of overpayment of death pension benefits was timely filed. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States INTRODUCTION The appellant is the widow of the veteran who served on active duty from August 1942 to November 1943. This matter comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a decision by the Committee on Waivers and Compromises (RO) at the VA Debt Management Center at Fort Snelling, Minnesota, which denied the appellant's request for a waiver of an overpayment based on a finding that the appellant's request for a waiver was not made within 180 days of being notified of the indebtedness and of her right to make such a request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. In a letter to the appellant dated October 2, 1992, and mailed to her address of record, she was informed by the RO that an overpayment of death pension benefits was made to her, creating a debt owed by her to the United States Government. She was informed that a request for waiver of the overpayment could be made at any time within 180 days. 2. The appellant's request for waiver was dated May 20, 1996, a time more than 180 days after notification. CONCLUSION OF LAW A timely request for waiver of recovery of an overpayment of death pension benefits was not filed by the appellant. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5302(a) (1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 1.963, 3.1 (q) (1999). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION Under applicable criteria, a request for waiver of an indebtedness shall only be considered if made within 180 days following the date of a notice of indebtedness to the debtor. The 180-day period may be extended if the individual requesting waiver demonstrates that, as a result of an error by either VA or the postal authorities, or due to other circumstances beyond the veteran's control, there was a delay in such individual's receipt of the notification of indebtedness beyond the time customarily required for mailing. If the requester does substantiate that there was such a delay in the receipt of the notice of indebtedness, the 180-day period shall be computed from the date of the requester's actual receipt of the notice of indebtedness. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5302(a); 38 C.F.R. § 1.963(b)(2). The record shows that following termination of the appellant's death pension benefits in 1992, she was informed, by official letter dated October 2, 1992, of the amount of the overpayment and of her right to request waiver of the overpayment within 180 days. The October 2, 1992, letter to the appellant was addressed to her address then of record and this is the same address that she has continued to use thereafter. A request for waiver of an indebtedness will only be considered if it is made 180 days following the date of notification of indebtedness that is issued on or after April 1, 1983. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5302(a); 38 C.F.R. § 1.963(b). Where VA mails a notice there is a presumption in the regularity of the administrative process. Mindenhall v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 271, 274 (1994). In a statement dated in May 1996, the appellant requested a waiver of the overpayment due to financial hardship. The request was clearly made in excess of 180 days after notice to the appellant of the existence of the indebtedness. The appellant has contended that she did not receive the notification letter in 1992 and she asserts that when the overpayment notification was sent, she was in the hospital. However, the Board notes that the law and regulations are dispositive and 38 C.F.R. § 3.1(q) provides that notice means "written notice sent to a claimant or payee at his or her latest address of record." A review of the record shows notice was sent to the appellant's last address and that there was no showing that the notice was returned as undeliverable or that she did not receive it. The local postmaster has indicated it is possible she did not receive the letter, but again there is no indication the letter was returned as undeliverable. Accordingly, the Board concludes that her application requesting waiver of recovery of the overpayment at issue was not timely filed. The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) has held that timeliness of a claim is a threshold matter. If the claim is untimely, the VA has no jurisdiction even to consider whether it is well grounded. Thompson v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 436, 438 (1994). In Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 426 (1994), the Court noted that in cases where the law and not the evidence is dispositive, as is the case here, a claim shall be denied or an appeal to the Board terminated because of the absence of legal merit or the lack of entitlement under the law. Accordingly, as a request for waiver of recovery of an overpayment of death pension benefits was not timely filed, the claim must be denied. ORDER The appellant's request for waiver of recovery of an overpayment of death pension benefits was not timely filed and the appeal is denied. Robert E. O'Brien Acting Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals