BVA9500660 DOCKET NO. 88-17 429 ) DATE ) RECONSIDERATION ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Phoenix, Arizona THE ISSUE Entitlement to service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Michael Martin, Associate Counsel REMAND The veteran had active service from June 1967 to April 1969, including service in the Republic of Vietnam from April 1968 to April 1969. This matter originally came before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a decision of November 1987 by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Buffalo, New York, Regional Office. In a decision of September 1988, the Board denied service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder. Subsequently, however, in a decision of February 1992, the Board granted service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder. In a rating decision of December 1992, the Phoenix, Arizona, Regional Office (RO) assigned a 30 percent disability rating for post-traumatic stress disorder with headaches, effective from April 5, 1989. In November 1993, the veteran filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Board's September 1988 decision. Although service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder has already been granted by the Board in the Board's February 1992 decision, the veteran seeks reconsideration of the September 1988 decision because a favorable decision could result in an earlier effective date for the compensation benefits. Reconsideration of the September 1988 decision was ordered in July 1994 under the authority granted the Chairman of the Board in 38 U.S.C.A. § 7103(b) (West 1991). The case is now before an expanded Reconsideration Section of the Board. The reconsideration decision, once promulgated, will replace the 1988 decision and constitute the final Board decision in this matter. Because the Board's February 1992 decision awarded service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder, the veteran's claim amounts to a claim for an earlier effective date for the award of service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder. The RO has undertaken some development of the earlier effective date issue. The RO denied an earlier effective date based in part upon the analysis that they could not go behind the Board's 1988 decision. That decision, however, has now been vacated and, therefore, is no longer a bar to consideration of an earlier effective date. In order to avoid any possible prejudice to the veteran, the claim for an earlier effective date should by fully adjudicated by the RO prior to further appellate review by the Board. See Curry v. Brown, No. 91-504 (U.S. Vet. App. Oct. 5, 1994). Accordingly, this case is remanded to the RO for the following action: The RO should consider the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder in light of the fact that the Board's 1988 decision has now been vacated. Unless the benefit sought by the veteran is granted to his satisfaction and he withdraws his appeal, the case should be returned to the Board in accordance with appropriate appellate procedures for further review. WARREN W. RICE, JR. JACQUELINE E. MONROE CHARLES E. HOGEBOOM FRANK J. FLOWERS JOHN J. SCHULE MICHAEL D. LYON Members, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).