BVA9500610 DOCKET NO. 93-10 774 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Montgomery, Alabama THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to service connection for a left hip disability. 2. Entitlement to service connection for a right elbow disability. 3. Entitlement to an increased (compensable) evaluation for a low back disability. 4. Entitlement to an increased (compensable) evaluation for pterygium involving the right eye. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Robert P. Regan, Counsel REMAND The appellant had active duty from October 1966 to September 1991. A review of the December 1991 VA examination reflects that x-rays of the lumbosacral spine were not performed. The Board of Veterans' Appeals is of the opinion that contemporaneous and thorough VA examinations would be of assistance in rendering a decision in this case. To ensure that VA has met its duty to assist the appellant in developing the facts pertinent to the claim, the case is REMANDED to the regional office (RO) for the following development: 1. The RO should obtain the names and addresses of all medical care providers who treated the appellant for low back, left hip, and right elbow disabilities and the pterygium involving the right eye since his retirement from active duty. After securing the necessary release, the RO should obtain these records. 2. The appellant should be afforded VA examinations by and orthopedist and an opthalmologist in order to determine the nature and severity of any disabilities involving the low back, left hip and right elbow, and the pterygium of the right eye, respectively. It is requested that the orthopedist, in conducting range of motion studies, include the degrees of normal range of the lumbosacral spine. It is requested that the opthalmologist render an opinion as to whether the appellant is experiencing diplopia in the right eye due to the pterygium per his assertion . The claims folder should be made available to the examiners for review before the examination. All testing, including x-rays of the lumbosacral spine, deemed necessary should be performed. Thereafter, the case should be returned to the Board, if in order. The Board intimates no opinion as to the ultimate outcome of this case. The appellant need take no action unless otherwise notified. ALBERT D. TUTERA Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This action has been taken in accordance with the Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-446, § 303, 108 Stat. 4645, ___ (1994), and is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).