Citation Nr: 0007631 Decision Date: 03/21/00 Archive Date: 03/28/00 DOCKET NO. 98-14 221 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Muskogee, Oklahoma THE ISSUE Whether the veteran is entitled to educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30, Title 38, United States Code, for periods of enrollment prior to February 9, 1997. ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD L. J. Nottle, Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active service from July 1991 to July 1995. His claim comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from an April 1998 determination of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office in Muskogee, Oklahoma (RO). The Board remanded this claim to the RO for additional development in September 1998. FINDING OF FACT On February 9, 1998, the RO received a trainee agreement and enrollment certification from Riverside County Sheriff's Department, and a letter from a sergeant at Ben Clark Public Training Center certifying the veteran's training from May 1996 to April 1997. CONCLUSION OF LAW The evidence does not satisfy criteria for entitlement to educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30, Title 38, United States Code, for periods of enrollment prior to February 9, 1997. 38 C.F.R. § 21.7131(a) (1999); 38 C.F.R. §§ 21.4131(a), 21.7131(a) (1998). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION The veteran had active service from July 1991 to July 1995. In April 1995, while still serving on active duty, he filed a VA Form 22-1990 (Application for Education Benefits), which did not reflect pursuit of any particular program of education. No actual educational assistance award was made at that time. In August 1995, the RO received another VA Form 22-1990 from the veteran, which reflected that the veteran had begun a program of education at Riverside Community College in July 1995. A VA Form 22-1999-3 (Enrollment Certification - Chapter 30) that was attached to this application verified the veteran's enrollment in an Associate degree program at Riverside Community College from July 1995 to December 1995. Based on these documents, the RO awarded the veteran Chapter 30 educational assistance benefits at the full-time rate for the period of enrollment noted. The RO received no additional correspondence from the veteran until February 9, 1998. On this date, the RO received: a State of California, Department of Industrial Relations training agreement from the Riverside County Sheriff's Department (Department), which reflected that the veteran had begun an on-the-job training program on May 20, 1996; a VA Form 22-1999 (Enrollment Certification), which reflected that the veteran had trained at the Department from May 1996 to May 1997; and a letter from a sergeant at the Ben Clark Public Safety Training Center, which indicated that the veteran had completed the probationary period of his apprenticeship in May 1997, by completing 2,000 hours of training. In March 1998, the RO received a VA Form 22-1995 (Request for Change of Program or Place of Training) from the veteran. This document discloses that the veteran graduated from Riverside Community College in December 1995, and was participating in an apprenticeship on-the-job training program so that he could become a correctional deputy. By letter dated April 1998, the RO informed the veteran that, although he was entitled to Chapter 30 educational assistance benefits for the training program he was pursuing, such benefits could not be paid for any periods of enrollment prior to February 9, 1997. This appeal ensues from the RO's April 1998 decision. To determine the merits of the veteran's appeal, it is necessary to review the law and regulations governing the assignment of commencing dates for Chapter 30 benefits. In this regard, the Board notes that, during the pendency of the veteran's appeal, the criteria for establishing commencing dates of an award of educational assistance benefits, to include Chapter 30 benefits, were amended, effective June 3, 1999. See 64 Fed. Reg. 23769-23773 (1999). These revised regulations are now codified at 38 C.F.R. § 21.4131 (1999). The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (known as the United States Court of Veterans Appeals prior to March 1, 1999) has held that where the law or a regulation changes after a claim has been filed or reopened, but before the appeal process has been concluded, the version most favorable to the claimant will apply, absent Congressional intent to the contrary. Karnas v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 308, 312-313 (1991). Inasmuch as Congress has not intended otherwise in this case, the Board must review both the former and revised criteria and determine whether either set of criteria provide a basis upon which to grant the veteran his claim. Regulations in effect prior to June 3, 1999 provide that, in a case in which the veteran is entering or reentering into a program of training, including a reentrance following a change of program or educational institution, the commencing date of an award of Chapter 30 educational assistance benefits is the latest of the following dates: the date certified by the educational institution under paragraph (b) or (c); the date one year prior to the VA's receipt of the claimant's application or enrollment certification, whichever is later; the effective date of the course approval, or one year before the VA receives the approval notice, whichever is later; or, the date of a reopened application under paragraph (d). 38 C.F.R. §§ 21.4131(a), 21.7131(a) (1998). In summary, the regulations in effect prior to June 3, 1999 prohibited an award of educational assistance for any period earlier than one year prior to the date of receipt of the application or enrollment certification, whichever is later. According to amended regulations, in a case in which a veteran is entering or reentering into a program of training, including a reentrance following a change of program or educational institution, the commencing date of the award of educational assistance is the latest of the following dates: (i) the date the educational institution certifies under paragraph (b) or (c); (ii) one year before the date of the claim as determined by 21.1029(b); or (iii) the effective date of the approval of the course, or one year before the VA receives the approval notice, whichever is later. 38 C.F.R. § 21.7131(a) (1999). In this case, the RO received the veteran's initial claim for Chapter 30 educational assistance benefits in April 1995 and enrollment certification verifying enrollment in the educational program at issue on February 9, 1998. Therefore, the earliest date that an award of educational assistance benefits could commence under the regulations in effect prior to June 3, 1999, is February 9, 1997, the date one year prior to the date of receipt of the veteran's claim for benefits and enrollment certification. Applying the revised regulations yields the same result. The earliest date that an award of educational assistance benefits could commence under the regulations in effect from June 3, 1999, is also February 9, 1997. In a letter from the Ben Clark Public Safety Training Center, a coordinator certified that the veteran began to pursue training on May 20, 1996. This date is therefore the certification date under 38 C.F.R. § 21.7131(a)(1)(i). See 38 C.F.R. § 21.7131(c). The RO received the veteran's initial claim for educational benefits on April 24, 1995; one year prior to this date is April 24, 1994. This date is therefore the applicable date under 38 C.F.R. § 21.7131(a)(1)(ii). Finally, the RO received an undated trainee agreement signed by the veteran and a representative of the Riverside County Sheriff's Department on February 9, 1998; one year prior to this date is February 9, 1997. This date is therefore the applicable date under 38 C.F.R. § 21.7131(a)(1)(iii). As previously noted, under 38 C.F.R. § 21.7131(a)(1), the latest date of the three, which in this case is February 9, 1997, controls. The regulatory criteria governing commencement dates of awards of Chapter 30 educational assistance benefits are clear and specific, and the Board is bound by them. Pursuant to these criteria, there is no basis upon which to grant the veteran Chapter 30 benefits for periods of enrollment prior to February 9, 1997. As the law in this case is dispositive, the veteran's claim must be denied based on a lack of entitlement under the law. Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 426, 430 (1994). ORDER The appeal is denied. S. L. KENNEDY Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals