Citation Nr: 0005499 Decision Date: 02/29/00 Archive Date: 03/07/00 DOCKET NO. 97-32 572A ) DATE ) ) THE ISSUE Whether there was clear and unmistakable error in prior decisions of the Board of Veterans' Appeals that denied the claim for entitlement to service connection for the cause of the veteran's death. REPRESENTATION Moving Party Represented by: George G. Olsen, Attorney at Law FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The veteran in this case served on active duty during World War II. 2. The moving party's prior claims of entitlement to service connection for the cause of the veteran's death were denied by the Board of Veterans' Appeals in decisions dated in February 1960, November 1973, September 1984, February 1986, August 1990, and August 1992. 3. On June 7, 1999, a motion for revision of a Board decision based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE) was filed. 4. The moving party's June 1999 CUE motion did not identify the specific Board decision to which the motion pertained. CONCLUSION OF LAW Because the requirements for a motion for revision of a decision based on clear and unmistakable error have not been met, the motion must be dismissed without prejudice to refiling. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1404(a) (1999). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION A motion for revision of a decision based on clear and unmistakable error must be in writing, and must be signed by the moving party or that party's representative. The motion must include the name of the veteran; the name of the moving party if other than the veteran; the applicable Department of Veterans Affairs file number; and the date of the Board of Veterans' Appeals decision to which the motion relates. If the applicable decision involved more than one issue on appeal, the motion must identify the specific issue, or issues, to which the motion pertains. Motions which fail to comply with the requirements set forth in this paragraph shall be dismissed without prejudice to refiling under this subpart. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1404(a) (1999) [formerly, Rule of Practice 1404(a), 64 Fed. Reg. 2139 (1999)]. Briefly, the moving party's prior claims of entitlement to service connection for the cause of the veteran's death were denied by the Board of Veterans' Appeals in decisions dated in February 1960, November 1973, September 1984, February 1986, August 1990, and August 1992. On June 7, 1999, a motion for revision of a Board decision based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE) was filed. The moving party's June 1999 CUE motion, however, did not identify the specific Board decision to which the motion pertained. A denial on the CUE motion at this time may preclude the Board from considering any further CUE motion on the Board's prior decisions. Because the moving party's motion fails to comply with the requirements set forth in 38 C.F.R. § 20.1404(a) [formerly, Rule of Practice 1404(a), 64 Fed. Reg. 2139 (1999)], the motion is dismissed without prejudice. ORDER The motion is dismissed without prejudice to refiling. Michael A. Pappas Acting Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals