Citation Nr: 0001598 Decision Date: 01/19/00 Archive Date: 01/28/00 DOCKET NO. 94-01 492 ) DATE ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Albuquerque, New Mexico THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to service connection for thrombophlebitis of the lungs, claimed as secondary to service-connected thrombophlebitis of the right leg. 2. Entitlement to a compensable rating for service-connected thrombophlebitis of the right leg. 3. Entitlement to an increased rating for residuals of total right knee replacement, currently evaluated as 60 percent disabling. 4. Entitlement to a compensable rating for right inguinal hernia repair. 5. Entitlement to an increased rating for bilateral pes planus, currently evaluated as 30 percent disabling. 6. Whether new and material evidence has been presented to reopen the veteran's claim for service connection for a respiratory disability. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Paralyzed Veterans of America, Inc. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The veteran in this case served on active duty from September 1940 to September 1945. 2. On December 20, 1999, the Board was notified by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office, Albuquerque, New Mexico, that the veteran died on August [redacted], 1999. CONCLUSION OF LAW Because of the death of the veteran, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this claim. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West Supp. 1999); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (1999). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION Unfortunately, the veteran died during the pendency of the appeal. As a matter of law, veterans' claims do not survive their deaths. Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). This appeal on the merits has become moot by virtue of the death of the veteran and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West Supp. 1999); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (1999). In reaching this determination, the Board intimates no opinion as to the merits of this appeal or to any derivative claim brought by a survivor of the veteran. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1106 (1999). ORDER The appeal is dismissed. G. H. SHUFELT Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals