BVA9502771 DOCKET NO. 93-06 493 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in No. Little Rock, Arkansas THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased rating for depressive neurosis with anxiety and post traumatic stress disorder, rated as 50 percent disabling. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans INTRODUCTION The veteran served on active duty from July to September 1965, from April 1968 to April 1970 and from November 1970 to July 1973. This appeal arose from a rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in No. Little Rock. In a statement dated June 16, 1992, the veteran claimed entitlement to compensable rating for allergic rhinitis and service connection for asthma. In his VA Form 1-9 received in December 1992, he appears to have claimed entitlement to a total rating based on individual unemployability. These issues are referred to the RO for appropriate action. REMAND The veteran underwent VA psychiatric examination in July 1992. However, the examiner did not relate the psychoneurotic symptoms to social and industrial inadaptability. A clinical assessment as to the resultant degree of social and industrial inadaptability is necessary to rate the service connected disability. In this regard, the examiner also diagnosed personality disorder in addition to psychoneurosis. At this point, the degree of social and industrial inadaptability due solely to the service connected depressive neurosis with anxiety and post traumatic stress disorder cannot be determined. In view of the foregoing, the case is REMANDED for the following action: 1. The RO should request copies of the veteran's treatment records from the VA Medical Center, Fayetteville, Arkansas, which date from mid 1992 to the present time, and associate those records with the claims file. 2. The RO should take the necessary steps to obtain records of the veteran's treatment from Stephen Harris, Ph.D., which date from mid 1992 to the present time. 3. The RO should schedule the veteran for a comprehensive VA psychiatric examination. This study must be conducted in accordance with the VA Physician's Guide for Disability Evaluation Examinations. All indicated tests, including appropriate psychological studies with applicable subscales, must be conducted. The claims file must be made available to and reviewed by the examiner prior to the requested study. The examiner must also state the following so that a determination can be made as to the degree of social and industrial inadaptability due to the depressive neurosis with anxiety and post traumatic stress disorder: (1) What are the signs and symptoms which are manifestations of the depressive neurosis with anxiety and post traumatic stress disorder, as far as can practically be determined; (2) What are the signs and symptoms of any underlying personality disorder, as far as can practically be determined; and (3) what is the degree of social and industrial inadaptability due solely to the depressive neurosis with anxiety and post traumatic stress disorder? 4. When this development has been completed, the RO must review the claims file and ensure that all of the foregoing development actions have been conducted and completed in full. If any development is incomplete, including if the requested examination does not include all test reports, special studies or opinions requested, corrective action should be undertaken. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) NANCY I. PHILLIPS Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals The Board of Veterans' Appeals Administrative Procedures Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-271, § 6, 108 Stat. 740, ___ (1994), permits a proceeding instituted before the Board to be assigned to an individual member of the Board for a determination. This proceeding has been assigned to an individual member of the Board. Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 1991), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Veterans Appeals. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (1993).